It is like there is a vendetta against Parents, and the Bill of Rights, especially the 1st Amendment: the Freedom of Religion. The Rights in the Bill of Rights were not written and expressed to use them against each other. Each Right is Sovereign and unalienable. One Right does not overcome the other, or annihilate the other. Each Right stands on its own, as if a Person, not to be argued with or trifled with. Our Bill of Rights is a testament of the sturdiness of the Sovereignty of each right. Each Right and Person is only weakened and mocked when one Right is pitted against the other.
The "right to privacy" is not a Right, but an assumption, and made from what was thought to be the totality of the Spirit of our Bill (the Bill of Rights). The fallacy of the "privacy," however, was used as a wedge against Parents in the raising of their children. The Bill of Rights (not one of them!) cannot be used as a convenient "stick" to wedge away a minor child from the Parent/Parents/Guardians. A minor child has only the Rights of the Parents, as the Parents must have (Rights) in terms of Life, Liberty, the Pursuit of Happiness, as well as school, health, shelter and any beliefs, codes and mores. You cannot strip Parent/Parents/Guardians of their Rights over their child/ren as a convenient way to prosecute an abortion. The stupidity of this is much characterized through the absolute legal guardianship of a parent HAVING to sign for a ridiculous ear piercing... versus having absolutely NO say when it comes to the incredible physical and psychological complexities of an abortion. An abortion is hard enough on an adult, but a child!? Leaving the Parent(s) out of this metric is child abuse. It is as if the government is saying that the only level of intelligence a Parent can conjure up is just the "simpleton" intelligence one must have to "okay"...an ear piercing. But a parent can't "handle"... an abortion?! Kids are not adoptive by the state through an arbitrary rule, and only "placed" in families by the state to "raise" them (on state terms).
There are families who have Religious beliefs. The ruling on the right to privacy rules against the Parents to have, as Sovereign in their lives, their Freedom of Religion, and the (clear) Expression thereof. We have already stated in the above material that one Right cannot be used against another in order to gain an advantage over the other. You cannot strip Sovereign Rights from the People and consider their Sovereignty nothing more than mediocrity, ignorance, and a toy for legislators and Justices to play with and rule against.
There is no precedence for stripping Rights away from individuals and call it, "...for the common good." This is no more than a human form of "eminent domain," taking the child from the parent and giving "it" to the state, yet without a trial of incompetency! There is no "common" in Sovereignty. We are all subject to laws, but our great and Sovereign Bill of Rights protects us from unjust laws and Remedies. Even criminals are treated with the respect of "Due Process" because of our Bill of Rights. Criminals get a trial. The Justices have wrongly and grossly assumed that Parents are "guilty" and not of the ability to tend to their minor child. There was absolutely no presumption of innocence for Parents as even criminals do get. Our Bill of Rights steps in the way of this presumption.
The only remedy congress and the Justices had against Parents was to invent a new "right;" ignore the Sovereign First Amendment and the Sovereignty of the Parent the Amendment protects, and override the Parents' authority over their own child, and take the child away; meaning, make the child a ward of the State in matters of abortion (only). They think Parents cannot possibly handle abortion! "Lions and tigers and bears, oh my!" The Parents total 1st Amendment Rights are defeated (bullied away!), and their Religion is deemed as inferior to the state, and therefore ignorant in any approach "it" has to the minor child as compared to the "superiority" of the state. There IS NO precedent for this! The state considers that it has given the minor child equal rights against the Parents, hiding the fact of the child being a minor, who only has Rights under the Parents, completely disregarding the natural Sovereign Rights of the Person under the Bill of Rights. The only Persons we have here are the individual Rights of the Bill of Rights...and the Parents. The minor child is not a person by this definition and therefore only falls under the Sovereign Parent...NOT the state.
Note that when a minor child finally turns 18, that Child is only then considered "legal" (excepting the legal Remedy of being emancipated from the Parents at a minor age). Emancipation of a minor child is a legal ruling ONLY... after a legal HEARING of the specific case. Giving a minor child the "right to privacy" with no individual hearing by any court on the competency of the parents (Emancipation), but a blanket ruling of the U.S. Justices, is a violation of the Parents' Sovereignty, and of the Constitution's "Due Process" clause, and the Sovereignty of the Bill of Rights of the Parents. If there is no individual hearing, there can be no ruling. The Supreme Court can't just take a minor child from the parents because it wants to.
Our (Parents') Rights are completely ignored and we are erroneously considered inferior and incompetent. The only reason for the U.S. Justices' ruling is superiority of the state (Statism) over each individual Parent, except for ear piercings and ANY other operation. The "right to privacy" IS abortion (per se), and IS absolutely the only reason for the Justices' ruling. Parents are singled out as absolutely and incontestably inferior by the state to make ANY decision about abortion concerning their minor child. There is absolutely NO precedent for such an arbitrary ruling. The ruling of the "right to privacy" remedy for a minor child is, therefore, ficticious. The ruling is specious at best, and the arguments, by definition, specious. You cannot "just" rule en masse against parents. We parents, as a whole, have not been found incompetent by ANY court. We have definitively not been individually found incompetent, therefore the state cannot take away our child and deny our Constitutional Rights. Our minor children are not equal to us. They are not our peers. As minors, they are our children.
Neither are opinions that the Sovereignty of the Bill of Rights is inferior to public opinion. Neither is any "group" superior to Parents and the Bill of Rights. You cannot undermine the authority of Parents by superceding the Bill of Rights with a "superior" ruling caused by the willful antagonism of any group. There is no superior ruling to the Bill of Rights, foreign or domestic. The basic unit of our country is the Family. The Family is Sovereign by the sheer existence of the Bill of Rights. No court can remove a Family's Sovereignty without Due Process and proving individual justification for doing so, as a crime or a hearing; finding any one individual Family unfit to raise their child. You cannot extinguish Family Rights, or "append" a Family's Sovereignty, by taking away Sovereign Rights.
Courts should never accept cases which compromise the Sovereign Constitutional Rights of the Parents unless a crime has been committed by the individual Parents, and there is justification to amend toward a proper behavior by that court, a Parent to a minor child.
Parents, normally, have committed no crime when a minor child has become pregnant out of wedlock. Therefore, there can be no abridging of Parental rights in favor of the minor child. The Parent is not under a disability just because the minor child is pregnant. No court, therefore, has the right to remove Constitutional Sovereign Rights of Parent(s) over their minor child. No civilian group, nor governmental group, has the right to bring suit against Parents (singly or as a whole) to estop their Sovereign Parental Rights over their minor child without a crime being first committed, or an individual hearing, determining that the Parents are not mature enough, or haven't the wisdom enough, to effect their Parental authority over their minor child.
If there be such a thing as the "right to privacy," it shall exist first...to the Sovereign Parents and for the Parents remedy and benefit against ANY inferior "social" platform agenda of any civilian or governmental group, again, absent any special individual hearing of any one Family to determine a disability, if one might exist, or if a Family has committed a crime, remembering always that the presumption of innocence before guilt is precedent before a remedy is rendered as judgment.
If there is no individual hearing or crime, no court can arbitrarily remove a Parent's charge from their minor child. No hearing, no crime, therefore no conviction, sentence, nor negative finding, and NO Parental disability.
Let the "right to privacy" of any minor child against their Parents be overturned, and the Sovereign Constitutional Bill of Rights of the Parents be restored as permanent Superior Entity, Parent over minor child, in full, without any abridgement or abrogation by any court, other "person," or group, whatever.
Saturday, June 27, 2009
Saturday, June 20, 2009
Proposed To Strengthen Our Constitution
Proposed for Amendment to: The Constitution of the United States of America
The Constitution of the United States of America shall be held as a Sovereign Document, of its Sovereign Country, at once unto itself as a Person, and to the several States it protects.
No Part of the Constitution shall be construed as inferior or superior to another Part of our same Constitution.
Each Amendment, and each Part of each Amendment, shall be respected as a Sovereign Right and Person, not to be weakened or made superior by argument from or against another Amendment, or Part of the same Amendment, or Part of another Amendment.
Each Amendment is Sovereign unto itself, as is the Constitution as a whole, and each Part of an any Amendment is Sovereign and stands on its own, even within its same Amendment.
One Amendment cannot be used against another Amendment, or a part of the same Amendment, or the part of another Amendment to silence it, because each is Sovereign.
The Amendment is as a Person. No Person is silenced because each Amendment, and Part thereof enjoys, in and of itself, the Freedom of Speech and all of the other enumerated Inalienable and Sovereign Rights.
No one Amendment, or Part thereof, of an Amendment can be used to belittle, accuse, vilify, or weaken another Amendment, or construed to be superior in any light to, a Part of an Amendment. No Amendment, nor Part thereof, can be silenced in favor of another. They are Equally Sovereign unto themselves and Stand Alone and to each other, as the Whole of the Constitution of the United States of America is Sovereign and Stands Alone.
Example: The Sovereign Freedom of Speech cannot be used against the Sovereign Freedom of Religion as a Remedy nor as a Disability. No Sovereign Branch of our Government, whether Legislative, Executive, or Judicial shall diminish any Sovereign Amendment, or Part thereof. Any Bill does not estop, hush, detain, diminish, deride, abuse, nor check any Sovereign Part of our Constitution.
The United States Constitution, a Person that is Inalienable, is as from God, and Breathes its Breath into the very fabric of Its total society which It created, unless a crime is committed against our Way of Life, and Due Process ensues, and Rights become suspended by assessed Remedy and/or Disability, or abolished on that person who is subject to our Laws.
The Constitution of the United States cannot be judged, cannot commit a crime, and cannot be so judged that it did, cannot err, and is therefore not subject to any other law, foreign or Domestic.
The Constitution of the United States of America is Itself a Sovereign Person, which grows carefully and righteously in Its search for Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness for its Citizens and those who are here legally.
Proposed for Amendment: by Stephen T. Hendel
1425 Lela Ln., Milford, Ohio 45150
(513) 722-3005
mathphonics@yahoo.com
“Radio-Free America” ©
The Constitution of the United States of America shall be held as a Sovereign Document, of its Sovereign Country, at once unto itself as a Person, and to the several States it protects.
No Part of the Constitution shall be construed as inferior or superior to another Part of our same Constitution.
Each Amendment, and each Part of each Amendment, shall be respected as a Sovereign Right and Person, not to be weakened or made superior by argument from or against another Amendment, or Part of the same Amendment, or Part of another Amendment.
Each Amendment is Sovereign unto itself, as is the Constitution as a whole, and each Part of an any Amendment is Sovereign and stands on its own, even within its same Amendment.
One Amendment cannot be used against another Amendment, or a part of the same Amendment, or the part of another Amendment to silence it, because each is Sovereign.
The Amendment is as a Person. No Person is silenced because each Amendment, and Part thereof enjoys, in and of itself, the Freedom of Speech and all of the other enumerated Inalienable and Sovereign Rights.
No one Amendment, or Part thereof, of an Amendment can be used to belittle, accuse, vilify, or weaken another Amendment, or construed to be superior in any light to, a Part of an Amendment. No Amendment, nor Part thereof, can be silenced in favor of another. They are Equally Sovereign unto themselves and Stand Alone and to each other, as the Whole of the Constitution of the United States of America is Sovereign and Stands Alone.
Example: The Sovereign Freedom of Speech cannot be used against the Sovereign Freedom of Religion as a Remedy nor as a Disability. No Sovereign Branch of our Government, whether Legislative, Executive, or Judicial shall diminish any Sovereign Amendment, or Part thereof. Any Bill does not estop, hush, detain, diminish, deride, abuse, nor check any Sovereign Part of our Constitution.
The United States Constitution, a Person that is Inalienable, is as from God, and Breathes its Breath into the very fabric of Its total society which It created, unless a crime is committed against our Way of Life, and Due Process ensues, and Rights become suspended by assessed Remedy and/or Disability, or abolished on that person who is subject to our Laws.
The Constitution of the United States cannot be judged, cannot commit a crime, and cannot be so judged that it did, cannot err, and is therefore not subject to any other law, foreign or Domestic.
The Constitution of the United States of America is Itself a Sovereign Person, which grows carefully and righteously in Its search for Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness for its Citizens and those who are here legally.
Proposed for Amendment: by Stephen T. Hendel
1425 Lela Ln., Milford, Ohio 45150
(513) 722-3005
mathphonics@yahoo.com
“Radio-Free America” ©
Saturday, June 13, 2009
Obama The High Priest ©
We have to understand "mentality" concerning Black Liberation Theology. Think about it: We believe that blacks are upset over just the Confederate flag of the South because of the connotations over slavery. There is a much bigger picture here. What we don't realize is that Black Liberation Theology has been preaching that it is the American flag that (so many) African-"American" blacks don't like. As at least one example: Rev. Wright (who Obama claims he hardly knows, stated, "America's CHICKENS...have come HOME...to ROOST!" And, "God DAMN America...!"
The American flag reminds blacks that they were NOT originally "invited," nor were they included (again, originally) in the Declaration of Independence or in the Constitution of the United States of America.
The colonies, however they were organized, were exclusive only to certain male whites. Blacks had no rights whatsoever, and "lived" at the pleasure of slave owners. Blacks had no rights, neither BEFORE the original Articles of Confederation, nor UNDER the Articles of Confederation (of the colonies), nor under our Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights. If a black man wanted to sue a white man for anything, he could not because he wasn't even considered a human being! Legally, blacks were considered animals until the Emancipation Proclamation, January 1, 1863. That is not a joke, nor a slight! It's true. To whites, at that time, in that culture, blacks were animals.
As late as 1970, I knew a woman, a member of a southern Baptist church, who argued vehemently that blacks were animals; she was taught that blacks had no soul and could not go to heaven. That church (the Synod of that church) has since apologized for their teachings.
So, here we are in our own safe little "world" called the United States of America, in the year 2009, not realizing that there are actual CITIZENS of the United States who want it to come "down." You have heard that Barach Obama was a community organizer? A community planner? And, as he was interviewed by many a news show, and commentator, and in the speeches he gave, he kept saying he had... "people?" He "had" the likes of James van Jones, an avowed Marxist communist; and "had" Bill Ayers, who was more than just a radical thinker...he used explosives to blow up a police station and other places. But he also has financiers like George Soros, an absolute global Socialist, and he and others are looking for a "return" on their "investment" in their President Obama.
Back to Black Liberation Theology...So, while "we" are all worried about the Confederate flag, and the continued "fallout" from that, it has been the American flag all along that blacks don't like. Blacks have always associated the American flag with slavery. True, blacks fought in our Revolutionary War, and all subsequent wars. Yet, they have never felt accepted, and, to them, they aren't accepted. Yet, unbeknownst to most blacks, most whites have accepted blacks...for years...as equals, in spite of some stupid churches and people.
Now, at the same time, we see Abraham Lincoln as the one who "freed" the slaves. You MUST understand that being "free" is evolutionary in itself - the concept of being "free" was even NEW at that time, even to most whites. Just look at the oppression against the colonists by the King. Back to my point. Black Liberation Theology sees Lincoln as the President who said, and I paraphrase, "Union first." "Union first" meant...rather than pushing for the abolition of slavery right away, which would cause the South and some Northern states to secede from the Union immediately, Lincoln decided to delay the abolition of slavery, keep the North together as a Union, and deal with the South as he could. He would tackle slavery later because he had to preserve the Union. Like it or not, as President, that was his first job, his first priority. Blacks and Liberation Theology have never forgiven that "slight" from President Lincoln. But they only knew about that later.
Blacks also have never forgiven that blacks, in that time, were slaves. Every generation of blacks teaches this history to the next generation of blacks. We, as "whites," and the rest of the nation, do not know this.
We see Lincoln as a liberator; blacks see him as the one who kept slavery going with "union first," even for the short while before their Emancipation. To blacks, Lincoln ended slavery so that Great Britain would not join the South against us in the Civil War. It was an expedient move, a political move, a move of strategy, and a move of aggrandizement of the Yankee North to England. It was not seen as a move of care, of love, or of conscience for the overall benefit of blacks.
The truth is, if Great Britain had joined the South against the North, the South would have been shocked (albeit too late) to realize that Great Britain would have eventually taken over "their" old colonies again. Neither the North nor the South would have been strong enough at that time, during our own Civil War, to fight off the British again. The Boston "Tea Party," the original Revolutionary War, and the War of 1812 would have been for nothing. We would again, today, be back under British rule. The British might have also retaken the Caribbean islands and continued their "olde profitable" slave trade. The British had eradicated slavery back home, but, unlike the United States, Britain was an imperialist nation and would NOT have ended slavery here.
Christianity among blacks is NOT the same as Christianity among whites. I personally had quite an experience of that. At a Pentecostal-type church I once attended, I held a cell-group at my house. We would discuss the previous Sunday's sermon. Blacks, who were supposed to come to my cell, and other blacks who were supposed to go to other cells, started their OWN cell. They snubbed us. When asked, they admitted it. Black Christians teach themselves a different thing. Whites are not invited. And they say WE are the racists?
We, as whites, do not know that blacks hold a grudge against Lincoln for his "Union first." Obama is President now. He is the first generation, cultural "product" of Black Liberation Theology “upbringing” to be President. He is a hardcore Democratic Socialist. The Black Liberation Theology culture is as ingrained in millions of blacks as the Roman Catholic culture is ingrained in Roman Catholics. He now considers himself black. He now evidently also considers himself Muslim. Blacks, who at first said he wasn't "black enough"...now embrace him. They, now, can't get enough of him. Barach Obama is now doing what those who espouse Black Liberation Theology wanted to do; he is slowly taking over the government, replacing our government.
He is slowly changing the operating system of our government from a Democratic Republic and one of a free-enterprise Capitalism, to a Socialist government and one of a reapportionment of our capital and tax monies. Right under our noses. He is robbing from the poor (you and me), to give to the rich (corporations!...bailouts...hello?)! This is a takeover...a very unique "eminent domain" of our tax money.
He commandeers (takes) by "eminent domain," taxes you and I paid, and he gives them, without oversight, or promise of payback...or profit, to failed businesses. He knows "we" will never get it back. That's the point. We slowly become a third-world nation like his "newly-found" African brothers. We lose our power and leverage in the world...on purpose (to his purpose).
As Obama said in his speech to the Muslim nations, " ... that no one nation can think of itself as being above other nations." Obama does not want the United States to be a super power any longer; but we are to be just like other nations, so now...we can no longer a “threat” to the world (we were a threat?).
Islam rules by the economic power and authority of their oil base. So, the playing field is NOT being leveled after all! Obama wants Islam to take control of the world. Notice that Obama is against ALL domestic oil drilling anywhere. He is only for the "elusive" green alternatives, which he hasn't and won't start. That is why they are elusive. Meanwhile, Islam becomes richer by plan. Gee, so does China...and North Korea...and Iran...and Japan.
You have to remember that blacks don't CARE what replaces our government: they just want it replaced. Blacks don't care about a plan. Any plan will do.
With Obama in charge, blacks will blindly trust him. What we "whites" further don't know is etymology; the originations of black thought. There is James Cone, a black man who wrote extensively about Black Liberation Theology in the ‘60’s, who said that the black intellectual's goal is to "...aid in the destruction of America as he knows it." This was in the magazine, "National Review."
Understand that Barach Obama was raised in the "dogmas" and "tenets" of Black Liberation Theology. Remember Reverend Wright? Twenty years a member?
According to him (James Cone), such a destruction of America requires both black anger ("God damn America!"), and white guilt (continual social programs we can't sustain). He claimed the black-power theologian's GOAL is to tell the story of American oppression so powerfully and precisely ("precisely" includes lying, and teaching that Jesus was black), that white men will "...tremble, curse, and go mad, because they will be drenched with the filth of their evil."
Black Liberation Theology has another tenet, "Collective Salvation," which basically states that we whites have taken everything from the black man and now they want it back! The truth is, there is no paying "it" back because Black Liberation Theology and collective salvation have no forgiveness. Their ideology is based on the Nation of Islam, a black separatist ideology which offers absolutely no forgiveness. Please notice that "Rev." Wright IS a black separatist. Obama sat under this mentality and brainwashing for 20 years.
Well, we are not trembling, cursing, or going mad (because we, now, have never known, nor had slaves), but yet “we” (our government) are already being replaced. Our new constitution is already being written. It is about to be installed. The ribbon ceremony is near. Instead of our Founding Fathers, we now have our destructing fathers, like van Jones, and Bill Ayers.
We have to also realize why Obama isn't going after the Second Amendment (gun laws). After our Constitution is replaced, we won't have a Second Amendment to worry about.
We will be without our own Sovereignty, but we will be under international law and the United Nations. They WILL take your guns away. They don't CARE if you go to jail.
In their thinking, we'll be getting a taste of our own medicine. We may not be slaves, but...being white, and Christian, we are already "profiled." This country, the United States of America, is being profiled, as white-imperialistic-capitalistic-free enterprise.
Homeland Security already issued a memo concerning, 1. military personnel coming home from the war, 2. Christians, and 3. pro-lifers, as being part of a possible right-wing conspiracy and that WE need to be watched. Then, Janet Napolitano stated, "Just kidding." Are you scared yet? You should be. And you're not on "Scare Tactics." You live in the United States of America, one step away from Sharia Law (Obama's next step), and European PROGRESSIVISM.
Take your last pictures of living in the “United States” as you know it. Why do you think something as conservative as "Jessica's Law" has not been enacted in the most very liberal states? Europe doesn't do anything about child exploitation (molestation) either. Child exploitation is a big market in Europe, and part of their thriving economy.
Obama also stated recently in his speech that we are NOT a Christian nation, but we ARE a Muslim nation. He bragged about his Muslim roots. Obama wasn't referring to The Nation of Islam, which is the closest ideology and cultural tie to Islam in this country, but he is referring to Black Liberation Theology, taught by the Rev. Jeremiah Wright at Trinity United Church of Christ, Chicago, his home church for at least 20 years, and is also taught at a host of other black churches.
Black Liberation Theology is a whole different "American" culture. It disdains and abhors traditional (biblical) white American culture and Christianity for how "white" it is. Remember that Black Liberation Theology teaches: that Jesus is black, and that institutional racism is as prevalent...as it ever was. And especially, that the blood of Christ cannot save you. You can accept Jesus as your personal savior all you want...you are not saved.
Black Liberation Theology condemns traditional American culture for its institutional racism. In condemning traditional American Christian culture, Black Liberation Theology has sought a replacement for..."us."
Their Hope has been serendipitously found in Barach Hussein Obama (actually, he was well-planned and trained), the embodiment of a new-age Christian, a neo-Muslim, a practicing Socialist, the consistently quintessential "yes-man" and shill of countless special-interest groups (actually, they are SELF-interest groups, narcissists, if you will) and he is THE "High Priest" of Black Liberation Theology, and its collective salvation.
In short, Obama is a new "evolution" of black liberation: the new, black, metro-man (cape and other accessories sold separately)! And he will be the leader of this hemisphere, "Pan America."
Written by: Stephen T. Hendel
radio-freeamerica.blogspot.com
The American flag reminds blacks that they were NOT originally "invited," nor were they included (again, originally) in the Declaration of Independence or in the Constitution of the United States of America.
The colonies, however they were organized, were exclusive only to certain male whites. Blacks had no rights whatsoever, and "lived" at the pleasure of slave owners. Blacks had no rights, neither BEFORE the original Articles of Confederation, nor UNDER the Articles of Confederation (of the colonies), nor under our Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights. If a black man wanted to sue a white man for anything, he could not because he wasn't even considered a human being! Legally, blacks were considered animals until the Emancipation Proclamation, January 1, 1863. That is not a joke, nor a slight! It's true. To whites, at that time, in that culture, blacks were animals.
As late as 1970, I knew a woman, a member of a southern Baptist church, who argued vehemently that blacks were animals; she was taught that blacks had no soul and could not go to heaven. That church (the Synod of that church) has since apologized for their teachings.
So, here we are in our own safe little "world" called the United States of America, in the year 2009, not realizing that there are actual CITIZENS of the United States who want it to come "down." You have heard that Barach Obama was a community organizer? A community planner? And, as he was interviewed by many a news show, and commentator, and in the speeches he gave, he kept saying he had... "people?" He "had" the likes of James van Jones, an avowed Marxist communist; and "had" Bill Ayers, who was more than just a radical thinker...he used explosives to blow up a police station and other places. But he also has financiers like George Soros, an absolute global Socialist, and he and others are looking for a "return" on their "investment" in their President Obama.
Back to Black Liberation Theology...So, while "we" are all worried about the Confederate flag, and the continued "fallout" from that, it has been the American flag all along that blacks don't like. Blacks have always associated the American flag with slavery. True, blacks fought in our Revolutionary War, and all subsequent wars. Yet, they have never felt accepted, and, to them, they aren't accepted. Yet, unbeknownst to most blacks, most whites have accepted blacks...for years...as equals, in spite of some stupid churches and people.
Now, at the same time, we see Abraham Lincoln as the one who "freed" the slaves. You MUST understand that being "free" is evolutionary in itself - the concept of being "free" was even NEW at that time, even to most whites. Just look at the oppression against the colonists by the King. Back to my point. Black Liberation Theology sees Lincoln as the President who said, and I paraphrase, "Union first." "Union first" meant...rather than pushing for the abolition of slavery right away, which would cause the South and some Northern states to secede from the Union immediately, Lincoln decided to delay the abolition of slavery, keep the North together as a Union, and deal with the South as he could. He would tackle slavery later because he had to preserve the Union. Like it or not, as President, that was his first job, his first priority. Blacks and Liberation Theology have never forgiven that "slight" from President Lincoln. But they only knew about that later.
Blacks also have never forgiven that blacks, in that time, were slaves. Every generation of blacks teaches this history to the next generation of blacks. We, as "whites," and the rest of the nation, do not know this.
We see Lincoln as a liberator; blacks see him as the one who kept slavery going with "union first," even for the short while before their Emancipation. To blacks, Lincoln ended slavery so that Great Britain would not join the South against us in the Civil War. It was an expedient move, a political move, a move of strategy, and a move of aggrandizement of the Yankee North to England. It was not seen as a move of care, of love, or of conscience for the overall benefit of blacks.
The truth is, if Great Britain had joined the South against the North, the South would have been shocked (albeit too late) to realize that Great Britain would have eventually taken over "their" old colonies again. Neither the North nor the South would have been strong enough at that time, during our own Civil War, to fight off the British again. The Boston "Tea Party," the original Revolutionary War, and the War of 1812 would have been for nothing. We would again, today, be back under British rule. The British might have also retaken the Caribbean islands and continued their "olde profitable" slave trade. The British had eradicated slavery back home, but, unlike the United States, Britain was an imperialist nation and would NOT have ended slavery here.
Christianity among blacks is NOT the same as Christianity among whites. I personally had quite an experience of that. At a Pentecostal-type church I once attended, I held a cell-group at my house. We would discuss the previous Sunday's sermon. Blacks, who were supposed to come to my cell, and other blacks who were supposed to go to other cells, started their OWN cell. They snubbed us. When asked, they admitted it. Black Christians teach themselves a different thing. Whites are not invited. And they say WE are the racists?
We, as whites, do not know that blacks hold a grudge against Lincoln for his "Union first." Obama is President now. He is the first generation, cultural "product" of Black Liberation Theology “upbringing” to be President. He is a hardcore Democratic Socialist. The Black Liberation Theology culture is as ingrained in millions of blacks as the Roman Catholic culture is ingrained in Roman Catholics. He now considers himself black. He now evidently also considers himself Muslim. Blacks, who at first said he wasn't "black enough"...now embrace him. They, now, can't get enough of him. Barach Obama is now doing what those who espouse Black Liberation Theology wanted to do; he is slowly taking over the government, replacing our government.
He is slowly changing the operating system of our government from a Democratic Republic and one of a free-enterprise Capitalism, to a Socialist government and one of a reapportionment of our capital and tax monies. Right under our noses. He is robbing from the poor (you and me), to give to the rich (corporations!...bailouts...hello?)! This is a takeover...a very unique "eminent domain" of our tax money.
He commandeers (takes) by "eminent domain," taxes you and I paid, and he gives them, without oversight, or promise of payback...or profit, to failed businesses. He knows "we" will never get it back. That's the point. We slowly become a third-world nation like his "newly-found" African brothers. We lose our power and leverage in the world...on purpose (to his purpose).
As Obama said in his speech to the Muslim nations, " ... that no one nation can think of itself as being above other nations." Obama does not want the United States to be a super power any longer; but we are to be just like other nations, so now...we can no longer a “threat” to the world (we were a threat?).
Islam rules by the economic power and authority of their oil base. So, the playing field is NOT being leveled after all! Obama wants Islam to take control of the world. Notice that Obama is against ALL domestic oil drilling anywhere. He is only for the "elusive" green alternatives, which he hasn't and won't start. That is why they are elusive. Meanwhile, Islam becomes richer by plan. Gee, so does China...and North Korea...and Iran...and Japan.
You have to remember that blacks don't CARE what replaces our government: they just want it replaced. Blacks don't care about a plan. Any plan will do.
With Obama in charge, blacks will blindly trust him. What we "whites" further don't know is etymology; the originations of black thought. There is James Cone, a black man who wrote extensively about Black Liberation Theology in the ‘60’s, who said that the black intellectual's goal is to "...aid in the destruction of America as he knows it." This was in the magazine, "National Review."
Understand that Barach Obama was raised in the "dogmas" and "tenets" of Black Liberation Theology. Remember Reverend Wright? Twenty years a member?
According to him (James Cone), such a destruction of America requires both black anger ("God damn America!"), and white guilt (continual social programs we can't sustain). He claimed the black-power theologian's GOAL is to tell the story of American oppression so powerfully and precisely ("precisely" includes lying, and teaching that Jesus was black), that white men will "...tremble, curse, and go mad, because they will be drenched with the filth of their evil."
Black Liberation Theology has another tenet, "Collective Salvation," which basically states that we whites have taken everything from the black man and now they want it back! The truth is, there is no paying "it" back because Black Liberation Theology and collective salvation have no forgiveness. Their ideology is based on the Nation of Islam, a black separatist ideology which offers absolutely no forgiveness. Please notice that "Rev." Wright IS a black separatist. Obama sat under this mentality and brainwashing for 20 years.
Well, we are not trembling, cursing, or going mad (because we, now, have never known, nor had slaves), but yet “we” (our government) are already being replaced. Our new constitution is already being written. It is about to be installed. The ribbon ceremony is near. Instead of our Founding Fathers, we now have our destructing fathers, like van Jones, and Bill Ayers.
We have to also realize why Obama isn't going after the Second Amendment (gun laws). After our Constitution is replaced, we won't have a Second Amendment to worry about.
We will be without our own Sovereignty, but we will be under international law and the United Nations. They WILL take your guns away. They don't CARE if you go to jail.
In their thinking, we'll be getting a taste of our own medicine. We may not be slaves, but...being white, and Christian, we are already "profiled." This country, the United States of America, is being profiled, as white-imperialistic-capitalistic-free enterprise.
Homeland Security already issued a memo concerning, 1. military personnel coming home from the war, 2. Christians, and 3. pro-lifers, as being part of a possible right-wing conspiracy and that WE need to be watched. Then, Janet Napolitano stated, "Just kidding." Are you scared yet? You should be. And you're not on "Scare Tactics." You live in the United States of America, one step away from Sharia Law (Obama's next step), and European PROGRESSIVISM.
Take your last pictures of living in the “United States” as you know it. Why do you think something as conservative as "Jessica's Law" has not been enacted in the most very liberal states? Europe doesn't do anything about child exploitation (molestation) either. Child exploitation is a big market in Europe, and part of their thriving economy.
Obama also stated recently in his speech that we are NOT a Christian nation, but we ARE a Muslim nation. He bragged about his Muslim roots. Obama wasn't referring to The Nation of Islam, which is the closest ideology and cultural tie to Islam in this country, but he is referring to Black Liberation Theology, taught by the Rev. Jeremiah Wright at Trinity United Church of Christ, Chicago, his home church for at least 20 years, and is also taught at a host of other black churches.
Black Liberation Theology is a whole different "American" culture. It disdains and abhors traditional (biblical) white American culture and Christianity for how "white" it is. Remember that Black Liberation Theology teaches: that Jesus is black, and that institutional racism is as prevalent...as it ever was. And especially, that the blood of Christ cannot save you. You can accept Jesus as your personal savior all you want...you are not saved.
Black Liberation Theology condemns traditional American culture for its institutional racism. In condemning traditional American Christian culture, Black Liberation Theology has sought a replacement for..."us."
Their Hope has been serendipitously found in Barach Hussein Obama (actually, he was well-planned and trained), the embodiment of a new-age Christian, a neo-Muslim, a practicing Socialist, the consistently quintessential "yes-man" and shill of countless special-interest groups (actually, they are SELF-interest groups, narcissists, if you will) and he is THE "High Priest" of Black Liberation Theology, and its collective salvation.
In short, Obama is a new "evolution" of black liberation: the new, black, metro-man (cape and other accessories sold separately)! And he will be the leader of this hemisphere, "Pan America."
Written by: Stephen T. Hendel
radio-freeamerica.blogspot.com
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
