Doesn't this prove the bible is wrong, that creation can't be just some several thousands of years old? Especially when their light takes MILLIONS of light years to reach us, not just a few thousand? What? You graduated from the university of...Duh!
Could it be that when God said, "let there be light!!" that the Lord put things in their place the way He wanted them? Could it be that the Lord showed us how central he is and how eternal He is by showing us how infinite the universe is, that the universe has no end? We take our eyes off him when we wonder about stars millions of light years away, and yet creationists say that bible science shows us that God created everything only some several thousands of years ago, not millions. How can this be?
Astronomers have found some incredibly large stars, some which are bigger than our entire solar system. There is no star small enough or large enough to be excluded from the universe, because there is no end to the universe. Each star is insignificantly small, no matter how large it is. A large star may as well be small. Largeness doesn't matter.
We are told that every galaxie has a black hole. There is an infinity of galaxies! There is an infinity of black holes. We are told that there is space dust. There is an infinity of space dust. There is an infinity of comets and asteroids.
The "downer" is that God didn't create the universe for us to explore it. We can send unmanned probes into the deepest of space, but we'll never go there. There will never be "hands-on" exploration to any significant degree. (I don't see Mars as significant. It's close, but who will volunteer to leave earth possibly forever and commit their lifetime to go there? Remember, "Star Trek" was unfortunately fiction. I, personally, would LOVE to be aboard the Enterprise. See, I even capitalized the Enterprise, I would love to be on it so much!
Then there is us! (The Earth). Sorry, not one scientist has come up with a planet like ours. It is hard for me to fathom that only we exist as the kind of being that we are, or the kind of planet we are. It is hard to fathom that there is absolutely no life in the universe but here. Yet, the universe is basically made up of the same thing: the elements. The elements comprise the universe. There may be elements "out there" we haven't discovered yet. That's because they are "out there."
At this point, we can't even bring back a Mars rock. Like the moon, "soon" we will.
To get at the question of life...sorry folks, there is absolutely no proof that the elements, in any combination, in any form, can produce life. Scientists can't "Frankenstein" it! It is a fact that life is here on this planet! How did life only get here? Again, there is absolutely no proof that there is life "out there." So, "out there" is disqualified. We are stuck with here.
Ready for the answer? I am ready for jeers, spitting, being fired...ah! You can't fire me. I'm not employed by you. Life never came from the elements alone. There is no DNA in matter (the elements). They are inert. Whether you like it or not, life (any DNA), is created by God: not by the elements. He used the elements. He is the only One who does the "Frankenstein" thing. Notice what I said...only God creates DNA. He created ALL life...not just us. Remember, Adam was sent out to name the animals. They have DNA! Adam wasn't told to go out and name
Science is a practicing atheist and will fire people if those people espouse what I just said. Yet, atheistic science and scientists can't do anything about the universe. They pompously speculate that they know all. I say "pompously speculate" because it takes a God-like ego and arrogance to act like they are above mere "creationist mortals" and fire them. You know, the height of human "God"-ery. They take food off of the table from children...the children of other scientists who have kids. Ben Stein did a great documentary on what I call "mad scientists." You know, those who take food away from kids and destroy lives.
Atheistic scientists think they are like the big stars out there. They still don't get it that no matter how big they are, in reality, they are as small to the universe as any other small star. Bigness doesn't matter. We are all "out there."
An atheist can't prove me wrong. There is no way to collect proof.
Now, back to Earth. When an astronautical engineer arrives on some planet or moon or asteroid that has a form of water, or water can be made, that engineer will try to "cross-contaminate" the water supply in order to "prove" life exists at least somewhere else (sort of like Al Gore inventing the internet, or managing to plagiarise a Hollywood movie scene of an iceberg into his "documentary" on global warming). The real "plagiarism" will be when the astronaut cross-contaminates the water supply with life from Earth. Then Obama can say to the world that "He" has discovered life on other planets (you know, "He'll" go from a "specific" to a "general."
How can an atheist scientist want to know where or how the universe began when he doesn't care to know who put it there in the first place? That's like not wanting to know your parents...that's pretty cold! (Now there's some ice)! And that is like an oxymoron, because the big bang was hot...ice...get it?...do I have to tell you everything?
The big bang could have come from ice. "Global" warming of the universe finally makes the big ice "cube" not just melt...but EXPLODE! Fire and water produces steam. A universe full of ice crystals and steam. Oxygen and hydrogen get split up and bind chemically to produce helium and other "resources" (work with me here) and you have gaseous planets (ask my kids about gaseous planets!) forming full of oxygen, hydrogen, helium...cloud planets, mostly steam. But water is still inert. You know, oxygen and hydrogen? Inert?
This is plausible. Remember, atheistic scientists believe that there was a big bang. That means all the elements were "born" from fire? Fire has to have at least heat and oxygen to "light." Then it has to have something combustible. But, hold it...where did the oxygen come from. Before the big bang, how long was the oxygen "hanging" around? And what?...one fine day, the oxygen sucked in upon itself, heat was produced and it exploded?
So...how do you get carbon from oxygen? I ask this question because science believes that inert elements created DNA. How did DNA evolve out of inerts? They don't care, they just believe it.
DNA is amino. But, no inert can "produce," under any circumstances [heat, pressure, cold, light, dark, any combination or mixture of inert elements, chance, time, vibration (they think maybe you can shake life into something?), NO vibration, the choices could go on]...no inert thing can produce a living thing. Therefore, there has to be a leap of intelligence (or should I say, an input from someone's intelligence), to create life with what's there. But nothing inert can produce life. (Please remember, the Genesis Experiment on the Star Trec movie was fiction).
All other life was created before man. We were the last of the DNA to be formed. Why?
We...man...is the point of all creation. You are the point of all creation. So, in a way, everything does revolve around us. That's what God says in the bible. But then, ALL creation revolves around God. That is also what God says in the bible.
For centuries, man has evolved their thinking about centricity. At one time, man thought that the sun and all creation revolved around the earth. Man was wrong. Their science was wrong. To the point, our galaxie revolves around a black hole, and our solar system revolves around the galaxie, and our planet revolves around the sun.
Before the last century, man revolved around God. Now, all intelligence revolves around a few scientists, a few actors (Shirley McClain, John Travolta, Tom Cruse, even John Denver), the founders of "EST," Vernon Wayne Howell (David Koresh), and a good host of others. Man has become his own "right wing" (being that most authors describing terrorism and those who are invoved in "deitistic" thinking consider this mentality "right wing"). Man now revolves around man, not God...or so they think. Wouldn't Shirley McClain love it if she found out she is considered right wing because she thinks she is a God! She would left-hook herself!
Man...revolves...around...man! Scary thought. This is a new form of slavery. It is slavery because those who think they are gods sociopathically keep others down. These gods believe they have "evolved" past everyone else because of their "amazing" life experiences, and how the public idolizes them. These people actually begin to believe that their opinions are, in fact, the truth! Just ask, oh, let's say, Tom Cruse. Yeah, Tom Cruse. He'll tell you that he is far more superior to any psychotherapist with years of study, training and experience. Just watch any tape of an interview with him, and let him "enlighten" you and fascinate you with, not arrogance and ego...no! He'll "enlighten" you with his god-intelligence and simple corrections of what we mere mortals think of as a healing profession. After listening to Him (Cruse), you would never think of getting help.
So now, man revolves around man. I guess this is the final step of evolution, the completion of the last step of the task of DNA. Now if we can only get off this rock and "DNA" our way around this stupid universe. Hey Shirley, Tom, John, all you guys, we're r/evolving! Hello?!
No comments:
Post a Comment