This email is part 2 of an email I sent to NPR yesterday. 'Talk of the Nation' was the venue. There were 2 veterans being interviewed for their "thoughts" on Afghanistan, and Iraq.
I had 'further' thoughts on the one veteran's idea of "exit strategy." This may also become a 'series' twitter. I'll tell ya, listening to NPR is the BEST school on the 'left,' and it's free!! Too bad I can't get a degree in this...whatever it is. But NPR causes me to think, and brings out my passion. Thanks.
Page 2: "Exit Strategy:" did you get a load of President Harry Truman's 'exit strategy' to end WWII? He dropped the atomic bomb! But... guess what?! His 'exit strategy' didn't work!! He had to come up with ANOTHER ...'exit strategy!!'
So, President Truman dropped ANOTHER atomic bomb!! What if that SECOND 'exit strategy' didn't work?!
Now - cut to today - that is why we don't have 'exit strategies!!' For one, we don't think of getting out... when we're getting in...we should send enough troops in to do the job right. When that eventually works, THEN we begin a process of pulling out, not before.
But you have to WIN first, then create an 'exit strategy.' You don't let things get in the way, such as failure, and culture. Their culture is why we are at war in the first place.
The atomic bomb is 'WHY' we don't have an 'exit strategy' anymore. If we can't solve 'it' by peaceful negotiations, or if we are (were - 9/11!) attacked, then we solve 'it' by overwhelming force (man-power!). It's called 'WAR.'
It seems that at least the SANE world has decided not to ever use nuclear force anymore...therefore...when you go to war (I covered 'war' earlier), you have to send in an overwhelming amount of force called... 'troops.'
You don't solve a 9/11 scenario with the 'limp-wrist' attitude of the Obama Administration. The Obama Administration needs to find another job...we'll help them in 2010...and especially... In 2012.
Yesterday, I wrote and twittered that the term 'exit strategy' was of the same humor and non-existence as baseball's 'bat stretcher.' There is no such thing. There is no such thing as an 'exit strategy.' It is a new political tool and strategy all it's own, invented by the Democratic Party, and was used as a political 'bully-pulpit' against President Bush. His Administration naively bought the idea, because they didn't realize there is no 'exit strategy' when you are beginning a war. You are not worried about getting out of the war when you are just getting in. Rumsfeld didn't realize he didn't have enough troops to effectively do the job, therefore the Bush Administration never got to plan how to get out. They eventually made the correction they needed to make, albeit too late, and acquired a very bad anti-war, anti-intelligent 'following.' The Bush mistake with Rumsfeld made the fictional 'exit strategy' really look good.
The Democrats knew that, but they weren't telling the 'rookie' Bush Administration. The Democrats really used this false pretense well. 'Exit strategy' was used as a catalyst to create more and more lies against Bush. After all, how could Bush be a good President when he didn't have an...'Exit Strategy'? Using the term, 'exit strategy,' made it look like each day the troops were there, that was one more day too long. "Oh!! The MORALITY...!!"
The press ate it up, simply because the media didn't know!! They had no idea there was no such thing as an 'exit stratgy.' Remember, the news media doesn't check much out. They didn't know it was like a 'bat stretcher,' but it sure sounded good...and it really made Bush look BAD!! It sold market share.
Mission accomplished!! But even Obama has no clue. He isn't going to send in more troops because he bought into what was only supposed to be a lame practical joke against Bush...the dreaded 'exit strategy!!' (You remember, the 'bat stretcher?) He doesn't have one!! He doesn't know he doesn't NEED one. This 'rookie' can't take a 'swing' because he can't find a ...'bat stretcher!!' I bet he's a Chicago Cubs fan...the 'curse' lives on...only now, American lives are at stake, not just a pennant. 'Private' Obama has put the Cubs' 'Curse' on the troops. They aren't going to win. But again, he doesn't like Bush.
"Obama's 'chickens' ...are coming HOME...to ROOST!!"
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Monday, October 19, 2009
NPR does it again! They don't get it.
NPR was having a 'discussion' about the analogy of Afghanistan to Vietnam, being a 'quagmire.' I think it's on 'Talk of the Nation.'
I can't believe what I'm hearing. The vets you have on have no real knowledge of history. They must have been trained by John Kerry, with a finishing school by Jane Fonda.
Back in the 'day,' Congress' indecision and politicizing the Vietnam war made it impossible for Congress to finish that war right. I'm speaking as a former Marine.
And please realize...that Kissinger only brokered a retreat for us...he did not end the Vietnam War peacefully. Remember, a retreat IS a military strategy. You can still attack a 'retreat' and maintain...'good form.' In the Gulf War, Saddam's Republican Guard went into full retreat from Kuwait. Our Air force and Navy detroyed them as they retreated...because a retreat IS still a military maneuver.
One of your guests talks about an 'exit strategy.' He says we never had an 'Exit Strategy' when we went into Afghanistan and Iraq. The exit strategy is a dead giveaway for a present-day democrat. That is a ploy of a democrat. It's a smart ploy. An analogy to the 'exit strategy' is a seasoned base-ball player telling a 'rookie' to get him a 'bat-stretcher.' There is no such THING as a bat-stretcher. There is no such THING as an 'exit strategy.' Most victimized presidents, like Bush, don't know that. That's why it was smart to bring up...'exit strategy.' It makes a president really look bad. Bush really thought he missed the memo on that one. He looked really stupid. But, Democrats...read on...
NO one EVER has an exit strategy when they go to war. There are too many variables. Show me FDR's exit strategy. Yeah, he had an exit strategy for fighting on three fronts (Germany, Italy, and Japan). "Exit strategy" is ONLY a political invention by a very jealous, present-day, Democrat party. We had no 'exit strategy' when we engaged our enemies in WW11, or WW1, or ANY wars the U.S. has ever engaged in. Can you imagine having an 'exit strategy' for ... the Revolutionary War? Hah!! Yeah, George Washington didn't get the memo on that one either...sort of like Bush. Right, Democrats? Oh. And by the way, Democrats, did you get the memo on the Vietnam War...that it was YOUR fault, YOUR quagmire. YOU started that one. A Republican had to end it for you...your quagmire. Oh. And you Democrats had ABSOLUTELY...no... "exit strategy." Oh. An "exit strategy" of epic proportions, DID start to form in 1968...at the Democratic National Convention...by the "Chicago Seven." I think it was a real riot.
Eventually seven defendants—Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, David Dellinger, Tom Hayden, Rennie Davis, John Froines, and Lee Weiner. They dropped Bobbie Seale. Your "exit strategy" started to "gel" in 1970 with the Kent State Massacre. Although Nixon was president then, this was your war, a Democrat war, started and "fanned" by whatever morality(?) you all thought you had.
You can't have an exit strategy when you first go to war, and you especially can't even DREAM of having an exit strategy from ANY war when it is mismanaged, second-guessed, your former Vice President SCREAMING tirades against Bush, and you continually charge your state-of-the-art troops with war crimes, and your CIA and other intelligence forces are continually investigated and threatened. Of course, NO ONE EVER INVESTIGATES THE TERRORISTS, or al Jazeera.
The enemy begins to see OUR... "exit strategy" when a timid, smooth-talking, 'child,' (in comparison to presidents before him), saunters onto the scene and talks only a good "game" of socialist 'appeasement,' not sound Capitalism and strength, and cavorts with known killer dictators (Chavez, et al).
YOUR 'exit strategy,' Democrats, is to so emasculate our troops, and so hog-tie them with charges, and making them actually read all captured enemy their (United States Bill of) rights (what rights?). They are now being read their (Obama) rights!!!
Congress has to make decisions. But this congress has absolutely no courage. We have nothing but a 'Private'-in-Chief in command of socialist wimps and political bigots, dumber than a "box o' rocks." He never served a day in his life. Those of them that have, I see why the United States is now in the condition we are in.
We do not have a war-time 'Privadent,' nor do we have a war-time democratic party. We only have a 'wimp-time' socialist party. No decision, lack-luster everything, and a 'Privadent' who continually misrepresents private business by stating that our TAX money has traditionally gone to pay for top executive bonuses...in the MILIONS!! It happens a couple of times in the bailouts, and Obama states that this is a regular business practice. Socialism is sooo weak compared to what this country was.
Back to our 'exit strategy.' What they aren't doing is listening to competent generals. They WILL listen to Rahm Emmanuel, and every anti-American BIGOT and goof (van Jones, et al.) who is against this country.
'Privadent' Obama is writing the book on 'quagmire,' bringing 'decision' to a new height of super-incompetence. Remember, not once did Obama EVER vote to support our troops when he was a Senator. Sorry, but voting ... "present...?" just doesn't ...'get it.'
I AM for pulling out (Oooh, surprise!)...but our troops should pull out by their own decision, commandeering any transportation they can get, and leaving on their own...immediately...as a show of NO CONFIDENCE for our 'Whatever-it-is-' in-Chief, 'Privadent' Obama. They can't arrest them all.
By staying 'in-country' there, without support from our president or congress, they have bulls-eyes painted in N-E-O-N on their backs. To Obama, the troops represent Bush's mistake in the middle-East. 'Privadent' Obama has vicariously left 'Bush' there to die.
Obama is VICARIOUSLY trying to kill Bush ...by not supporting the troops, or sending MORE troops. The Democrats are presently giving every excuse they can...but...they hate President Bush that much. So they hate and try to kill, vicariously, ANYONE who reminds them of Bush. That's why the troops are sort of...left there... stooges of the Democratic Party.
I can't believe what I'm hearing. The vets you have on have no real knowledge of history. They must have been trained by John Kerry, with a finishing school by Jane Fonda.
Back in the 'day,' Congress' indecision and politicizing the Vietnam war made it impossible for Congress to finish that war right. I'm speaking as a former Marine.
And please realize...that Kissinger only brokered a retreat for us...he did not end the Vietnam War peacefully. Remember, a retreat IS a military strategy. You can still attack a 'retreat' and maintain...'good form.' In the Gulf War, Saddam's Republican Guard went into full retreat from Kuwait. Our Air force and Navy detroyed them as they retreated...because a retreat IS still a military maneuver.
One of your guests talks about an 'exit strategy.' He says we never had an 'Exit Strategy' when we went into Afghanistan and Iraq. The exit strategy is a dead giveaway for a present-day democrat. That is a ploy of a democrat. It's a smart ploy. An analogy to the 'exit strategy' is a seasoned base-ball player telling a 'rookie' to get him a 'bat-stretcher.' There is no such THING as a bat-stretcher. There is no such THING as an 'exit strategy.' Most victimized presidents, like Bush, don't know that. That's why it was smart to bring up...'exit strategy.' It makes a president really look bad. Bush really thought he missed the memo on that one. He looked really stupid. But, Democrats...read on...
NO one EVER has an exit strategy when they go to war. There are too many variables. Show me FDR's exit strategy. Yeah, he had an exit strategy for fighting on three fronts (Germany, Italy, and Japan). "Exit strategy" is ONLY a political invention by a very jealous, present-day, Democrat party. We had no 'exit strategy' when we engaged our enemies in WW11, or WW1, or ANY wars the U.S. has ever engaged in. Can you imagine having an 'exit strategy' for ... the Revolutionary War? Hah!! Yeah, George Washington didn't get the memo on that one either...sort of like Bush. Right, Democrats? Oh. And by the way, Democrats, did you get the memo on the Vietnam War...that it was YOUR fault, YOUR quagmire. YOU started that one. A Republican had to end it for you...your quagmire. Oh. And you Democrats had ABSOLUTELY...no... "exit strategy." Oh. An "exit strategy" of epic proportions, DID start to form in 1968...at the Democratic National Convention...by the "Chicago Seven." I think it was a real riot.
Eventually seven defendants—Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, David Dellinger, Tom Hayden, Rennie Davis, John Froines, and Lee Weiner. They dropped Bobbie Seale. Your "exit strategy" started to "gel" in 1970 with the Kent State Massacre. Although Nixon was president then, this was your war, a Democrat war, started and "fanned" by whatever morality(?) you all thought you had.
You can't have an exit strategy when you first go to war, and you especially can't even DREAM of having an exit strategy from ANY war when it is mismanaged, second-guessed, your former Vice President SCREAMING tirades against Bush, and you continually charge your state-of-the-art troops with war crimes, and your CIA and other intelligence forces are continually investigated and threatened. Of course, NO ONE EVER INVESTIGATES THE TERRORISTS, or al Jazeera.
The enemy begins to see OUR... "exit strategy" when a timid, smooth-talking, 'child,' (in comparison to presidents before him), saunters onto the scene and talks only a good "game" of socialist 'appeasement,' not sound Capitalism and strength, and cavorts with known killer dictators (Chavez, et al).
YOUR 'exit strategy,' Democrats, is to so emasculate our troops, and so hog-tie them with charges, and making them actually read all captured enemy their (United States Bill of) rights (what rights?). They are now being read their (Obama) rights!!!
Congress has to make decisions. But this congress has absolutely no courage. We have nothing but a 'Private'-in-Chief in command of socialist wimps and political bigots, dumber than a "box o' rocks." He never served a day in his life. Those of them that have, I see why the United States is now in the condition we are in.
We do not have a war-time 'Privadent,' nor do we have a war-time democratic party. We only have a 'wimp-time' socialist party. No decision, lack-luster everything, and a 'Privadent' who continually misrepresents private business by stating that our TAX money has traditionally gone to pay for top executive bonuses...in the MILIONS!! It happens a couple of times in the bailouts, and Obama states that this is a regular business practice. Socialism is sooo weak compared to what this country was.
Back to our 'exit strategy.' What they aren't doing is listening to competent generals. They WILL listen to Rahm Emmanuel, and every anti-American BIGOT and goof (van Jones, et al.) who is against this country.
'Privadent' Obama is writing the book on 'quagmire,' bringing 'decision' to a new height of super-incompetence. Remember, not once did Obama EVER vote to support our troops when he was a Senator. Sorry, but voting ... "present...?" just doesn't ...'get it.'
I AM for pulling out (Oooh, surprise!)...but our troops should pull out by their own decision, commandeering any transportation they can get, and leaving on their own...immediately...as a show of NO CONFIDENCE for our 'Whatever-it-is-' in-Chief, 'Privadent' Obama. They can't arrest them all.
By staying 'in-country' there, without support from our president or congress, they have bulls-eyes painted in N-E-O-N on their backs. To Obama, the troops represent Bush's mistake in the middle-East. 'Privadent' Obama has vicariously left 'Bush' there to die.
Obama is VICARIOUSLY trying to kill Bush ...by not supporting the troops, or sending MORE troops. The Democrats are presently giving every excuse they can...but...they hate President Bush that much. So they hate and try to kill, vicariously, ANYONE who reminds them of Bush. That's why the troops are sort of...left there... stooges of the Democratic Party.
Thursday, October 15, 2009
Catholic Answers to Homosexuality and Pedophilia
I listen in to 740 AM in Cincinnati. I don't remember the name of the radio show, but there are people who call in and one of you tries to answer. Of course, your show is not a discussion. You tell them what "is."
I take issue with a couple of things I have heard.
For one, I forget the term you used, but the closest thing I can come to it is "knowledgable." I am a "knowledgable" former Catholic, which makes me a "reprobate" Catholic. I was a strict Catholic for 35 years. I married in a Methodist church at the age of 35. I heard you speak to at least two Catholics, answering them about whether a protestant can be saved. You said "yes," as long as the person does not know the truth of the Catholic Church. You said if the person is knowledgable of the Catholic church, and that the person knows it is the only true way, and the person remains protestant, then that person will not be saved, even if that person accepted Jesus as his personal Savior.
I take GREAT issue with you, and also the Catholic Church. If you don't mind reading further, whether you think I am a "heretic" or not, please read. This is the only way I have of speaking with you. I am not angry (I am passionate about this), but I have some insights you have never heard before, plus my own personal story (I'll be brief, don't worry).
The Roman Catholic Church cannot any longer tell US its dogma and tenets when it breathes the sin and cult of homosexuality and pedophilia in "the Church." How can I say this? You better hang on to your seat; I am about to tell you the truth. Again, no anger, just the truth. Hear me out. I listen to you guys without saying a word (of course, you are on radio).
The Roman Catholic Church is NOT the same Church as the Church of Paul, or Peter, or Timothy, or even Jesus. Why do I say that?
I am not referring to the daily healings and miracles of that "day." I am referring to the years and years of "the Church" hiding the active "lifestyle" homosexuals AND pedophiles IN the Church.
For years, possibly generations, the Catholic Church has hidden the sin and debauchery of homosexuality and pedophilia. The Church has simply moved these many priests "around" to "hide" them, permitting these priests to go about their "duties."
As a child, I was an altar boy, and nothing at all ever happened. No priest or brother ever bothered me, nor did I ever sense I was in any danger.
Others have not been so lucky. I am slowly getting to "why" the Catholic Church can't tell me (or others) whether they are saved or not. You're not going to like it. But it's true. Just hang on.
Although I had no problems with any priest or brother, I consider myself lucky compared to the onslaught of actual charges of various types of pedophilia and rampant homosexuality in the Church. How often I would read the papers and see another priest charged with another sexual crime. There were true reports coming out about priests being constantly transferred because the priest could not "curb" his appetite. Hmm!
I would tell my wife that there had to be an "underground" of pedophilia and homosexuality right in the Church. Little did I know...
It finally dawned on me that the Church itself...was harboring, actually permitting... actually "blessing"... this behavior. I determined that the Holy Roman Catholic Church itself... IS... a cult of pedophilia and homosexuality! From the "top" down, the Church is involved in it.
At least one priest, Fr. Paul R. Shanley, was not only a pedophile, he was involved in NAMBLA! NAMBLA is the "North American Man-Boy Love Association," and he IS a chief founding "Father" (Pun intended). I have read his comments and his beliefs. I also can easily "read" the similar comments and beliefs of the Catholic Church, and how the Catholic Church permitted his behavior, even sharing. Let's not be naive about this and why his actions and lifestye was able to flourish. He was involved in trying to persuade lawmakers to change "age-of-consent" laws so he (and other pedophiles) could have sex with babies. I've read the NAMBLA web site. I began investigating it in 1999.
Very specifically, and as politically incorrect as I can get, I was disgusted. Because the Catholic Church had a "lifestyle" of hiding these priests, the Catholic Church approved of NAMBLA! You read right...the Catholic Church approved of NAMBLA by their very act of hiding these priests throughout the "network" of churches and schools throughout this country (and maybe the world). This is where the Catholic Church picks up the designation of "underground," or "cult." It became a "brotherhood" of pedophilia and homosexuality. And you can't guarantee "now."
This is where the church LOST its ability (by the direct intervention of the Holy Spirit!) to profer dogma, tenets, Ex Cathedra (God help us!!). I know what you're thinking! Do I mean the Pope is in on this? Do you know how many YEARS it took the Pope to say anything at all about this? You don't have a "SEAT" of Peter. If Jesus were here, he would whip at you guys like he did the money changers in the synagogue that day! That day was nothing compared to this. This is more like Sodom and Gomorrah, and you know why THEY were destroyed?!
Because of how long it took the Church to get a "handle" on "this," it is OBVIOUS that the whole Church is in on it. Underground (or above ground) the Church itself approved of all behaviors. I can't imagine what happened to the whistle-blowers of the Church. How were THEY disciplined years AGO, and years ON, for trying to get in the way of their... "fun."
I'm not done yet!! At one time, I wanted to go into the priesthood. There were a few guys I knew who decided (before I did) to go into the seminary. This was about 1974. They went to Duns Scotus (I think it is, or was, a Franciscan seminary). WITHIN THE YEAR they came back with stories of "initiation" rites. There would be a knock on your dorm-room door. You would open it and several seminarians would rush in on you and butt-rape you. They came home. They did not pursue the priesthood anymore. Homosexuality and pedophilia is institutional in and as, The Roman Catholic Church.
You can't tell me dogma and tenets, or if I am in sin or not. John wrote the Apocolypse. To one of the churches, he told them He would take away their lampstand (the Holy Spirit). Well, He took away yours. The Roman Catholic Church reminds Him of Sodom and Gommorah. But see, the Church is not a city. It is all over the world, mostly as parishes. How does God deal with a Church's "real estate?" He takes away your lampstand. Jesus does not show up anymore, not in sacraments, not in Holy Orders... because your sin is from the top down.
I can't imagine how many parishes have closed because of a lack of support (duh!). I gave a priest my opinion back in the '90's (before I knew about "this" problem, concerning "a" reason why the Catholic Church is having to close parishes or combining them. I advised it is (at that time) because of charismatic Catholics joining non-denominational churches. They needed to be "fed." Half of any non-denominational churchs' members are former Catholics. The Roman Catholic Church is losing its "faithful" to protestant churches. This is true. Of course, he said it was all demographics, that parishoners simply moved out. Yeah. They also "moved on."
If a man is listening to God, he is where the Holy Spirit is. We don't lead...He does.
I promised you my small testimony. You say people like me are not saved, even if I accept Jesus as my Savior. You say it is because I won't accept the truth (of the Church), when I fully know (supposedly) what the truth is, and that, although I know Jesus as my Savior, I do not know Him in the further truth and revelation of the Roman Catholic Church.
Before I was saved (and I was a Catholic in this period of my life), I was a United States Marine. A long story short, I was "toe-tagged," and my body put aside to go to the morgue so they could operate on the next Marine. I was pronounced dead. A Navy Commander, the anesthesiologist during my operation, later told me there was no way I should be alive (I obviously, "somehow," "came back"). At the time, I was paralysed and could only talk, and he asked me what I was now going to do with my life. I advised him I was going back home to work at a TV station. He was furious! He said he never saw anyone else survive what I went through. He said I was alive because I was "called" by God to be in the ministry. "Sir," I said, "I am a Catholic." The Commander said, "He saw you through this...He can see you through anything."
The Commander was prophetic. My life has been spared at least 5 times that I know of (He told me about one of them, concisely, in 7 words). I have also been healed of things as a Catholic, AND as a "reprobate Catholic." In January 2006, at 58 years old, and not a Catholic for YEARS, I received a phenomenal healing, akin to an arm or leg growing out. He talked to me again during that one. Oh, I'm saved, all right!
I told my wife about another thing. At the non-denominational church I go to, the pastors talk constantly about tithing. They even claim that you can't get healing or ANY favor from the Lord if you don't tithe. We had a visiting evangelist who said, rather arrogantly, that the pastor shouldn't even counsel anyone who DIDN'T tithe.
Do you realize that Jesus only gave. He never once said you must give tithes before you can come to Him for a healing. Anyone he healed, there was no charge. What He did was to obey His Father. His Father wasn't looking for money or gifts. He was looking for obedience (at least from Jesus). When He told Mary Magdalene, "Go and sin no more," you know she had no tithe to give Him. His words freed her, healed her of actual sin.
That is NOT what we see in the Roman Catholic Church. Secular man had to CATCH the Roman Catholic Church in the act. By "in the act," I mean that secular man (humanists, if you will) had to expose what was going on in the Church, NOT the Church disciplining ITSELF from the very start. The Catholic Church hasn't had a "Paul," or a "Peter," or a "Timothy" in the Church for centuries. It shows! Again, you don't have a lampstand, because you don't have the Holy Spirit.
We tithe only some, mostly because of extreme expenses we incur. Our mechanic gets 700 dollars' "tithe" at a time, sometimes twice a year.
But do you realize how many times the Lord has blessed me without tithing? My first-born daughter was an infant and had projectile vomiting. Nothing worked to treat her. She was hot and sick. I was home alone with her one night. I decided to pray for the next 3 hours before my wife got home from work. My wife got home. I told her that we were going in her bedroom and not coming out 'til she was healed. We walked in and started praying, casting out sickness. Within about 15 minutes we saw a little black "cloud" leaving her and going toward the bedroom window. It started back at my daughter. I yelled at it to leave, "... in the Name of Jesus!" It immediately turned back toward the window and left. My daughter was healed from that moment. Notice, from scripture, in the Book of Acts (the 7 sons of Sceva), that whatever it was... it knew the Name of Jesus, it knew Paul, and it knew OUR names! We weren't running...IT was! We were not Catholic. You can believe what you want, and you will (if you don't, you'll lose your job on the radio). I AM saved! And I have FULL knowledge of the Catholic Church. This couldn't have happened without our being saved. Go ahead, read about the seven sons of Sceva!
All of my kids are saved. And it shows. They are all virgins, and they all know the Lord. They are quite aware of the Catholic Church and other churches. They are "home-schooled" in politics, religion, cults, race, et cetera. We go to tea parties. They understand.
So now, who is reprobate? YOU cannot see the truth. The truth IS Jesus Christ. The Catholic Church is not greater than Jesus. Jesus even said of the man who was not of their "discipleship," but he spoke well of the name of Jesus, if he be not against us, he is for us. Listen, the truth is NOT inhiding sin. Paul said in one of his epistles (and I paraphrase), I hear among you that a son is sleeping with his mother. I don't recall the place in the New Testament. But, Paul advised STRONGLY, and immediately I might add, that the congregation shun them. The Catholic Church has not led in this discipline at all; rather, law suits have cropped up and brought the Church's involvement in pedophilia and homosexuality to the scrutiny of the whole world, and the secular world at that. Involvement means permitting, hiding, moving priests around so there are even MORE victims.
You don't have a lampstand. You ARE Sodom and Gommorah. When you go to church and look upon the exposed Host (in the Monstrance) on the altar (Jesus is supposed to be present), He is not there. The Roman Catholic Church has not repented. The Church must repent and be healed from the top down. This was caused by the "top." The "top" were in on it.
There has only been somewhat of a "compliance" to the secular world, but NOT repentance to God. And as we have all learned, a pedophile and a homosexual cannot be "rehabbed"... except by the absolute direct intervention of God. On that, I refer you to Dr. James Dobson of "Focus On The Family." "Focus On The Family" has had a guest or two who gave their testimony about being "exorcised" of a homosexual demon. These testimonies are true, and amazing. The Catholic Church needs to check this out.
I take issue with a couple of things I have heard.
For one, I forget the term you used, but the closest thing I can come to it is "knowledgable." I am a "knowledgable" former Catholic, which makes me a "reprobate" Catholic. I was a strict Catholic for 35 years. I married in a Methodist church at the age of 35. I heard you speak to at least two Catholics, answering them about whether a protestant can be saved. You said "yes," as long as the person does not know the truth of the Catholic Church. You said if the person is knowledgable of the Catholic church, and that the person knows it is the only true way, and the person remains protestant, then that person will not be saved, even if that person accepted Jesus as his personal Savior.
I take GREAT issue with you, and also the Catholic Church. If you don't mind reading further, whether you think I am a "heretic" or not, please read. This is the only way I have of speaking with you. I am not angry (I am passionate about this), but I have some insights you have never heard before, plus my own personal story (I'll be brief, don't worry).
The Roman Catholic Church cannot any longer tell US its dogma and tenets when it breathes the sin and cult of homosexuality and pedophilia in "the Church." How can I say this? You better hang on to your seat; I am about to tell you the truth. Again, no anger, just the truth. Hear me out. I listen to you guys without saying a word (of course, you are on radio).
The Roman Catholic Church is NOT the same Church as the Church of Paul, or Peter, or Timothy, or even Jesus. Why do I say that?
I am not referring to the daily healings and miracles of that "day." I am referring to the years and years of "the Church" hiding the active "lifestyle" homosexuals AND pedophiles IN the Church.
For years, possibly generations, the Catholic Church has hidden the sin and debauchery of homosexuality and pedophilia. The Church has simply moved these many priests "around" to "hide" them, permitting these priests to go about their "duties."
As a child, I was an altar boy, and nothing at all ever happened. No priest or brother ever bothered me, nor did I ever sense I was in any danger.
Others have not been so lucky. I am slowly getting to "why" the Catholic Church can't tell me (or others) whether they are saved or not. You're not going to like it. But it's true. Just hang on.
Although I had no problems with any priest or brother, I consider myself lucky compared to the onslaught of actual charges of various types of pedophilia and rampant homosexuality in the Church. How often I would read the papers and see another priest charged with another sexual crime. There were true reports coming out about priests being constantly transferred because the priest could not "curb" his appetite. Hmm!
I would tell my wife that there had to be an "underground" of pedophilia and homosexuality right in the Church. Little did I know...
It finally dawned on me that the Church itself...was harboring, actually permitting... actually "blessing"... this behavior. I determined that the Holy Roman Catholic Church itself... IS... a cult of pedophilia and homosexuality! From the "top" down, the Church is involved in it.
At least one priest, Fr. Paul R. Shanley, was not only a pedophile, he was involved in NAMBLA! NAMBLA is the "North American Man-Boy Love Association," and he IS a chief founding "Father" (Pun intended). I have read his comments and his beliefs. I also can easily "read" the similar comments and beliefs of the Catholic Church, and how the Catholic Church permitted his behavior, even sharing. Let's not be naive about this and why his actions and lifestye was able to flourish. He was involved in trying to persuade lawmakers to change "age-of-consent" laws so he (and other pedophiles) could have sex with babies. I've read the NAMBLA web site. I began investigating it in 1999.
Very specifically, and as politically incorrect as I can get, I was disgusted. Because the Catholic Church had a "lifestyle" of hiding these priests, the Catholic Church approved of NAMBLA! You read right...the Catholic Church approved of NAMBLA by their very act of hiding these priests throughout the "network" of churches and schools throughout this country (and maybe the world). This is where the Catholic Church picks up the designation of "underground," or "cult." It became a "brotherhood" of pedophilia and homosexuality. And you can't guarantee "now."
This is where the church LOST its ability (by the direct intervention of the Holy Spirit!) to profer dogma, tenets, Ex Cathedra (God help us!!). I know what you're thinking! Do I mean the Pope is in on this? Do you know how many YEARS it took the Pope to say anything at all about this? You don't have a "SEAT" of Peter. If Jesus were here, he would whip at you guys like he did the money changers in the synagogue that day! That day was nothing compared to this. This is more like Sodom and Gomorrah, and you know why THEY were destroyed?!
Because of how long it took the Church to get a "handle" on "this," it is OBVIOUS that the whole Church is in on it. Underground (or above ground) the Church itself approved of all behaviors. I can't imagine what happened to the whistle-blowers of the Church. How were THEY disciplined years AGO, and years ON, for trying to get in the way of their... "fun."
I'm not done yet!! At one time, I wanted to go into the priesthood. There were a few guys I knew who decided (before I did) to go into the seminary. This was about 1974. They went to Duns Scotus (I think it is, or was, a Franciscan seminary). WITHIN THE YEAR they came back with stories of "initiation" rites. There would be a knock on your dorm-room door. You would open it and several seminarians would rush in on you and butt-rape you. They came home. They did not pursue the priesthood anymore. Homosexuality and pedophilia is institutional in and as, The Roman Catholic Church.
You can't tell me dogma and tenets, or if I am in sin or not. John wrote the Apocolypse. To one of the churches, he told them He would take away their lampstand (the Holy Spirit). Well, He took away yours. The Roman Catholic Church reminds Him of Sodom and Gommorah. But see, the Church is not a city. It is all over the world, mostly as parishes. How does God deal with a Church's "real estate?" He takes away your lampstand. Jesus does not show up anymore, not in sacraments, not in Holy Orders... because your sin is from the top down.
I can't imagine how many parishes have closed because of a lack of support (duh!). I gave a priest my opinion back in the '90's (before I knew about "this" problem, concerning "a" reason why the Catholic Church is having to close parishes or combining them. I advised it is (at that time) because of charismatic Catholics joining non-denominational churches. They needed to be "fed." Half of any non-denominational churchs' members are former Catholics. The Roman Catholic Church is losing its "faithful" to protestant churches. This is true. Of course, he said it was all demographics, that parishoners simply moved out. Yeah. They also "moved on."
If a man is listening to God, he is where the Holy Spirit is. We don't lead...He does.
I promised you my small testimony. You say people like me are not saved, even if I accept Jesus as my Savior. You say it is because I won't accept the truth (of the Church), when I fully know (supposedly) what the truth is, and that, although I know Jesus as my Savior, I do not know Him in the further truth and revelation of the Roman Catholic Church.
Before I was saved (and I was a Catholic in this period of my life), I was a United States Marine. A long story short, I was "toe-tagged," and my body put aside to go to the morgue so they could operate on the next Marine. I was pronounced dead. A Navy Commander, the anesthesiologist during my operation, later told me there was no way I should be alive (I obviously, "somehow," "came back"). At the time, I was paralysed and could only talk, and he asked me what I was now going to do with my life. I advised him I was going back home to work at a TV station. He was furious! He said he never saw anyone else survive what I went through. He said I was alive because I was "called" by God to be in the ministry. "Sir," I said, "I am a Catholic." The Commander said, "He saw you through this...He can see you through anything."
The Commander was prophetic. My life has been spared at least 5 times that I know of (He told me about one of them, concisely, in 7 words). I have also been healed of things as a Catholic, AND as a "reprobate Catholic." In January 2006, at 58 years old, and not a Catholic for YEARS, I received a phenomenal healing, akin to an arm or leg growing out. He talked to me again during that one. Oh, I'm saved, all right!
I told my wife about another thing. At the non-denominational church I go to, the pastors talk constantly about tithing. They even claim that you can't get healing or ANY favor from the Lord if you don't tithe. We had a visiting evangelist who said, rather arrogantly, that the pastor shouldn't even counsel anyone who DIDN'T tithe.
Do you realize that Jesus only gave. He never once said you must give tithes before you can come to Him for a healing. Anyone he healed, there was no charge. What He did was to obey His Father. His Father wasn't looking for money or gifts. He was looking for obedience (at least from Jesus). When He told Mary Magdalene, "Go and sin no more," you know she had no tithe to give Him. His words freed her, healed her of actual sin.
That is NOT what we see in the Roman Catholic Church. Secular man had to CATCH the Roman Catholic Church in the act. By "in the act," I mean that secular man (humanists, if you will) had to expose what was going on in the Church, NOT the Church disciplining ITSELF from the very start. The Catholic Church hasn't had a "Paul," or a "Peter," or a "Timothy" in the Church for centuries. It shows! Again, you don't have a lampstand, because you don't have the Holy Spirit.
We tithe only some, mostly because of extreme expenses we incur. Our mechanic gets 700 dollars' "tithe" at a time, sometimes twice a year.
But do you realize how many times the Lord has blessed me without tithing? My first-born daughter was an infant and had projectile vomiting. Nothing worked to treat her. She was hot and sick. I was home alone with her one night. I decided to pray for the next 3 hours before my wife got home from work. My wife got home. I told her that we were going in her bedroom and not coming out 'til she was healed. We walked in and started praying, casting out sickness. Within about 15 minutes we saw a little black "cloud" leaving her and going toward the bedroom window. It started back at my daughter. I yelled at it to leave, "... in the Name of Jesus!" It immediately turned back toward the window and left. My daughter was healed from that moment. Notice, from scripture, in the Book of Acts (the 7 sons of Sceva), that whatever it was... it knew the Name of Jesus, it knew Paul, and it knew OUR names! We weren't running...IT was! We were not Catholic. You can believe what you want, and you will (if you don't, you'll lose your job on the radio). I AM saved! And I have FULL knowledge of the Catholic Church. This couldn't have happened without our being saved. Go ahead, read about the seven sons of Sceva!
All of my kids are saved. And it shows. They are all virgins, and they all know the Lord. They are quite aware of the Catholic Church and other churches. They are "home-schooled" in politics, religion, cults, race, et cetera. We go to tea parties. They understand.
So now, who is reprobate? YOU cannot see the truth. The truth IS Jesus Christ. The Catholic Church is not greater than Jesus. Jesus even said of the man who was not of their "discipleship," but he spoke well of the name of Jesus, if he be not against us, he is for us. Listen, the truth is NOT inhiding sin. Paul said in one of his epistles (and I paraphrase), I hear among you that a son is sleeping with his mother. I don't recall the place in the New Testament. But, Paul advised STRONGLY, and immediately I might add, that the congregation shun them. The Catholic Church has not led in this discipline at all; rather, law suits have cropped up and brought the Church's involvement in pedophilia and homosexuality to the scrutiny of the whole world, and the secular world at that. Involvement means permitting, hiding, moving priests around so there are even MORE victims.
You don't have a lampstand. You ARE Sodom and Gommorah. When you go to church and look upon the exposed Host (in the Monstrance) on the altar (Jesus is supposed to be present), He is not there. The Roman Catholic Church has not repented. The Church must repent and be healed from the top down. This was caused by the "top." The "top" were in on it.
There has only been somewhat of a "compliance" to the secular world, but NOT repentance to God. And as we have all learned, a pedophile and a homosexual cannot be "rehabbed"... except by the absolute direct intervention of God. On that, I refer you to Dr. James Dobson of "Focus On The Family." "Focus On The Family" has had a guest or two who gave their testimony about being "exorcised" of a homosexual demon. These testimonies are true, and amazing. The Catholic Church needs to check this out.
Sunday, October 4, 2009
Muslim "men"
The "oppressive" Christian God (Jesus), did not "tell" "peace-loving" Muslims to murder absolutely innocent people (including children) by crashing two (2) fully loaded (meaning, with people) commercial jets into the World Trade Center. Their "unoppressive" Allah did.
Nor did the "oppressive" Christian God (Jesus), "tell" "peace-loving" Muslims to murder absolutely innocent people by crashing a commercial jet into the Pentagon. Their "unoppressive" Allah did.
Nor did the "oppressive" Christian God "tell" "peace-loving" Muslims to TRY to crash a commercial jet into either the White House or the Capitol Building. Their "unoppressive" Allah did. The "oppressive" Christians and some others aboard THAT flight were able to heroically avert THAT crash, and these "oppressive" Christians and some others made the "peace-loving" Muslims crash into the ground in Pennsylvania instead.
As a former "oppressive" Marine and a currently "oppressive" Christian, I couldn't have performed a more heroic deed than what those "oppressive" Christians did, and what others aboard that flight did, including the children (who were possibly "oppressive"), that were aboard.
If we were truly a Christian nation, we wouldn't be Socialists, we'd be Christians, laying hands on the sick, casting out demons, and feeding the poor (check out all of the "socialist" Christian organizations who feed the poor all over this world, which the world kings and governments WON’T do because of their greed, corruption, genocide, female circumcision, and a HOST of other atrocities that these "peace-loving" "unoppressive" Muslims inflict on people all over the world).
I don't think our "oppressive" and "socialist" Jesus teaches us to do that in our "oppressive" bible. By the way, contrary to what seems to be current popular opinion, Jesus never killed anybody. God did "sneak" it in with Sodom and Gomorrah, and you did watch the "Ten Commandments" (Cecil B. Demille)? Things like that.
Ahh! But notice! He did that Himself! If He wants to kill people, He's "man" enough to do it Himself. That may be your litmus test for what is of God...and what is not. Hmmmm? God doesn't tell us to kill people, except for what happened sometimes in the OLD Testament. Oh! I know...you think you got me! In the New Testament, Ananias and Sophira are struck down dead. But read the evidence. All Peter did was speak the words, and Ananias and Sophira were struck down. Peter didn't touch them. God did. Read it. It's in the Book of Acts. And they committed no crime against the "state."
By the way, just to note...the people of Sodom and Gommorah did not commit crimes against the "State" either. Their homosexual behavior was an offense to God. That's why he destroyed them. Read it. Oh! And the Pharo committed no crimes against the "State." The Pharo WAS the "State." He could do what he wanted. This was not a movie, but became one. He was an offense to God and God took care of him and Egypt. There's more. You gotta read it.
Now, look at more of what Muslims do. By the way...Allah can't "do", because "he's" just a concept. They don't believe in a "person" being God. You can be killed for that. Wow! They sure like to kill, don't they?
Now, remember: "unoppressive" Allah, not our "oppressive" Jesus, "tells" (causes) Muslim men and fathers to commit murder...and things like "honor killings" of their daughters. We had one in Cincinnati not too long ago.
Just recently, a newer, more IMPROVED version of an "unoppressive" young "unoppressive" Muslim terrorist drove a vehicle into a parking facility inside of a building and pressed the button thinking he was going to have his...seven virgins.
When he pressed the detonator button, he didn’t scream “… For Jesus!!” No. He screamed “…for Allah!!” The explosives the undercover agents gave the terrorist were not explosives. How "oppressive" of them! They were duds. So, these "oppressive" undercover agents saved lives with their "oppressive" "sting" operation.
I personally know that many agents are "oppressive" Christians. They "oppressively" save lives like that every day, possibly even your "unoppressive" life.
You know, wearing an "unoppressive" burka, or any of the "unoppressive" female Muslim dress-code items is a religious sign of subserviance to their "unoppressive" "men." Women are, basically, property, to their "unoppressive" "men." Remember, "unoppressive" Muslim men use their women and children as shields when they … "fight." I love such a masculine hero, don't you?
Nor did the "oppressive" Christian God (Jesus), "tell" "peace-loving" Muslims to murder absolutely innocent people by crashing a commercial jet into the Pentagon. Their "unoppressive" Allah did.
Nor did the "oppressive" Christian God "tell" "peace-loving" Muslims to TRY to crash a commercial jet into either the White House or the Capitol Building. Their "unoppressive" Allah did. The "oppressive" Christians and some others aboard THAT flight were able to heroically avert THAT crash, and these "oppressive" Christians and some others made the "peace-loving" Muslims crash into the ground in Pennsylvania instead.
As a former "oppressive" Marine and a currently "oppressive" Christian, I couldn't have performed a more heroic deed than what those "oppressive" Christians did, and what others aboard that flight did, including the children (who were possibly "oppressive"), that were aboard.
If we were truly a Christian nation, we wouldn't be Socialists, we'd be Christians, laying hands on the sick, casting out demons, and feeding the poor (check out all of the "socialist" Christian organizations who feed the poor all over this world, which the world kings and governments WON’T do because of their greed, corruption, genocide, female circumcision, and a HOST of other atrocities that these "peace-loving" "unoppressive" Muslims inflict on people all over the world).
I don't think our "oppressive" and "socialist" Jesus teaches us to do that in our "oppressive" bible. By the way, contrary to what seems to be current popular opinion, Jesus never killed anybody. God did "sneak" it in with Sodom and Gomorrah, and you did watch the "Ten Commandments" (Cecil B. Demille)? Things like that.
Ahh! But notice! He did that Himself! If He wants to kill people, He's "man" enough to do it Himself. That may be your litmus test for what is of God...and what is not. Hmmmm? God doesn't tell us to kill people, except for what happened sometimes in the OLD Testament. Oh! I know...you think you got me! In the New Testament, Ananias and Sophira are struck down dead. But read the evidence. All Peter did was speak the words, and Ananias and Sophira were struck down. Peter didn't touch them. God did. Read it. It's in the Book of Acts. And they committed no crime against the "state."
By the way, just to note...the people of Sodom and Gommorah did not commit crimes against the "State" either. Their homosexual behavior was an offense to God. That's why he destroyed them. Read it. Oh! And the Pharo committed no crimes against the "State." The Pharo WAS the "State." He could do what he wanted. This was not a movie, but became one. He was an offense to God and God took care of him and Egypt. There's more. You gotta read it.
Now, look at more of what Muslims do. By the way...Allah can't "do", because "he's" just a concept. They don't believe in a "person" being God. You can be killed for that. Wow! They sure like to kill, don't they?
Now, remember: "unoppressive" Allah, not our "oppressive" Jesus, "tells" (causes) Muslim men and fathers to commit murder...and things like "honor killings" of their daughters. We had one in Cincinnati not too long ago.
Just recently, a newer, more IMPROVED version of an "unoppressive" young "unoppressive" Muslim terrorist drove a vehicle into a parking facility inside of a building and pressed the button thinking he was going to have his...seven virgins.
When he pressed the detonator button, he didn’t scream “… For Jesus!!” No. He screamed “…for Allah!!” The explosives the undercover agents gave the terrorist were not explosives. How "oppressive" of them! They were duds. So, these "oppressive" undercover agents saved lives with their "oppressive" "sting" operation.
I personally know that many agents are "oppressive" Christians. They "oppressively" save lives like that every day, possibly even your "unoppressive" life.
You know, wearing an "unoppressive" burka, or any of the "unoppressive" female Muslim dress-code items is a religious sign of subserviance to their "unoppressive" "men." Women are, basically, property, to their "unoppressive" "men." Remember, "unoppressive" Muslim men use their women and children as shields when they … "fight." I love such a masculine hero, don't you?
Thousands upon thousands are killers
When you KNOW that Muslim colleges teach hate for Christians and Jews, and the “West” in general, how safe can you feel?
The Muslim ideology is the ONLY one I know where thousands and thousands, even millions of them, are killers.
Look at the African Muslim nations which are committing, and have committed, genocide throughout Africa. "Genocide" means they have murdered … and in the millions of people.
We are fighting two wars against Muslims. If we were not attacked, we wouldn't be there. Oh! And "coincidentally," we are fighting thousands and thousands of ... Muslims.
In Fallusia alone, we killed 1,000 Muslims. Did I say we are killing thousands and thousands of Muslims? That must mean that we are at war with a LOT of Muslims. Is that hate speech...or is saying we are at war with MUSLIMS... "politically incorrect?"
Or am I wrong? What ideology are they? I think...I really do...I think...they are Muslims. Where have I heard THAT ideology before?
Ah! I remember! Tripoli. Remember?..."From the Halls of Montezuma...to the shores of Tripoli...we will fight our countries battles on land, the air and sea..."
The Marine Corps Hymn! Tripoli...Thomas Jefferson went to Tripoli to ask why our ships were being pirated by...hmmm...Muslims! He was told that they will attack who they want...especially Christians! Us. They considered us...Christians (back then it was a "complement" to be called a Christian). We went to war...obviously. Or we wouldn't have the above in the Hymn.
What other ideology murdered us on 9/11, or who murdered us at the USS Cole, or who murdered nearly 300 Marines in their barracks, or who attempted to blow up the World Trade Center the FIRST time in 1993 (or '94)? They were Muslims. Hey, don't stop me...I'm on a roll...like John Belushi in "Animal House."
We're not fighting Hindus, or Lutherans, or Ba' Hai, or the Catholic Church. I don't think we're fighting the Jesuits, or even "The Fighting Irish" at the University of Notre Dame.
Wow! We're fighting Muslims. They keep attacking us and keep TRYING to attack us. This MUST mean they hate us. And they keep educating their young against us, both here and in their own countries. And even succeeding.
And how many Americans went to these local Muslim mosques and colleges, became Muslim converts, then went on to become terrorists themselves, against the United States? And some people think it's "okay" to breed their death to us in colleges ... HERE? So...it ...IS,... it IS...politically CORRECT ...for THEM to teach hate for the United States, and Christians, and Jews...here. It's legal. Now, where do you suppose they get to try out what they have ..."learned?" You better watch that building you walk into.
Can you imagine Muslim countries letting AMERICANS build colleges in THEIR countries to breed hatred and death against THEM?
When was the last time an American suicide-bomber walked into a heavily populated shopping place in Saudi Arabia, or Lebanon, or Syria, or Iran, or Mogadishu...and pressed the button to his detonator, screaming..."for JESUS!!!"
Oh! I know…you're asking...what am I trying to say? You're kidding...right...?
The Muslim ideology is the ONLY one I know where thousands and thousands, even millions of them, are killers.
Look at the African Muslim nations which are committing, and have committed, genocide throughout Africa. "Genocide" means they have murdered … and in the millions of people.
We are fighting two wars against Muslims. If we were not attacked, we wouldn't be there. Oh! And "coincidentally," we are fighting thousands and thousands of ... Muslims.
In Fallusia alone, we killed 1,000 Muslims. Did I say we are killing thousands and thousands of Muslims? That must mean that we are at war with a LOT of Muslims. Is that hate speech...or is saying we are at war with MUSLIMS... "politically incorrect?"
Or am I wrong? What ideology are they? I think...I really do...I think...they are Muslims. Where have I heard THAT ideology before?
Ah! I remember! Tripoli. Remember?..."From the Halls of Montezuma...to the shores of Tripoli...we will fight our countries battles on land, the air and sea..."
The Marine Corps Hymn! Tripoli...Thomas Jefferson went to Tripoli to ask why our ships were being pirated by...hmmm...Muslims! He was told that they will attack who they want...especially Christians! Us. They considered us...Christians (back then it was a "complement" to be called a Christian). We went to war...obviously. Or we wouldn't have the above in the Hymn.
What other ideology murdered us on 9/11, or who murdered us at the USS Cole, or who murdered nearly 300 Marines in their barracks, or who attempted to blow up the World Trade Center the FIRST time in 1993 (or '94)? They were Muslims. Hey, don't stop me...I'm on a roll...like John Belushi in "Animal House."
We're not fighting Hindus, or Lutherans, or Ba' Hai, or the Catholic Church. I don't think we're fighting the Jesuits, or even "The Fighting Irish" at the University of Notre Dame.
Wow! We're fighting Muslims. They keep attacking us and keep TRYING to attack us. This MUST mean they hate us. And they keep educating their young against us, both here and in their own countries. And even succeeding.
And how many Americans went to these local Muslim mosques and colleges, became Muslim converts, then went on to become terrorists themselves, against the United States? And some people think it's "okay" to breed their death to us in colleges ... HERE? So...it ...IS,... it IS...politically CORRECT ...for THEM to teach hate for the United States, and Christians, and Jews...here. It's legal. Now, where do you suppose they get to try out what they have ..."learned?" You better watch that building you walk into.
Can you imagine Muslim countries letting AMERICANS build colleges in THEIR countries to breed hatred and death against THEM?
When was the last time an American suicide-bomber walked into a heavily populated shopping place in Saudi Arabia, or Lebanon, or Syria, or Iran, or Mogadishu...and pressed the button to his detonator, screaming..."for JESUS!!!"
Oh! I know…you're asking...what am I trying to say? You're kidding...right...?
The cult of Homosexuality in the Catholic Church
The Diane Rehm show had an interview related to church and homosexuals today on NPR. This is a response.
I see the homosexuality debate in "religion" the same as I see belief differences in Christian cults. What I mean by "cults" are the "Christian" religions that are an aberration of the mainstream Christian dogmas. Cults are not mainstream; neither is the homosexual "take" on Christianity.
From Sodom and Gomorrah, to Paul in the New testament, the bible is absolute against homosexuality (and of course other sins, like spouses going out on each other (adultery), and singles having illicit sex (fornication).
Jesus himself told Mary Magdalene to..."Go, and sin no more." She was an adulteress (adultery is sin). Even then, the rabbi's tried to trick Jesus with sin. People today try all the time to trick Christians with sin, and make fun of us, and now at this particular time, with homosexual sin.
Hollywood, various news networks (NPR), the GLA, even our wonderful educational system run by Planned Parenthood and their sycophant, the NEA, are trying hard to sexualize our children. Newer textbooks are even written which show no differences between a two-male parent household, a two-female parent household, or a male-female parent household (of course we all TOLD that the two females believe their household is better).
So, when my kids come home from school and tell us these things, we, [my wife (female) and I (male)] get out the bible and explain what is going on (yes, we are born-again). We let our kids know we were married in a church (similar to the wedding feast at Cana), that we are celibate to the world and exclusive for each other, that God really and truly is ONLY for heterosexual marriage (it says so in scripture). We show them the scriptures. We explain the incontestability of the scriptures, that our opinion really doesn't change what God says. God doesn't change with the times.
We tell them that it's good that God doesn't change with the times. Think what would happen if one "day" God got ticked at Christians and decided to say that his death on the cross is invalid, that he "takes it back" because we aren't worth it. Then we say, "But Jesus, look what's written in your word!" He then says (sarcastically), "So?"
And no, I do not espouse "once saved always saved."
His word is his word. It doesn't change...he doesn't change. You can always count on him. The benefits of "sola scriptura" are immense.
Without sola scriptura you can make any change you want to fit your "need." People miss the fact that Jesus died ACCORDING to scripture. He didn't change it to fit his need (and he had quite a need at the time, don't you think?) Shoot, if scripture was good enough for him to DIE for, wouldn't you think it's good enough for us to LIVE for?
Could I find a scripture or two that would conjure up the idea that I could have sex with whomever I like? Hey, look at what David did to get a girl. He had her husband killed. Remember what Jesus said to Mary..."Go and sin no more." He didn't say, "You should have been a little more discreet, duh!"
It is NOT true that "they" are just like us. Yeah, "they" go shopping just like "we" do, and "they" do other things just like "we" do. "They" study, drive cars, go to restaurants..., but that is not the real issue.
Male homosexuals put their penis in another man's (or boys') butt. That is the general act they are known for. What women homosexuals generally do is cunillingus. So, no, "they" are NOT just like "me," or my kids. And they can't have my kids.
Now, back to cults: the way homosexuals talk about God and scripture is cult. "They" think what they want, regardless of what the bible says. To them, the bible is wrong. As like other cults, a homosexual's Christianity is what THEY think it should be. They even say that Jesus and John were homosexuals..., and they quote, "The disciple that Jesus 'loved'...”
Christians do not accuse Jesus, or any disciple, of being homosexual. Well, maybe the Lutherans do. God (Jesus) is not homosexual. Like murder, this sin is not given a "pass."
The bible is not run by the news media or homosexuals. The bible wasn't written by homosexuals. The bible doesn't answer to "them." Jesus doesn't answer to "them." And even Jesus answered to scripture. That's how important scripture is. And when Jesus answered to it, it was basically just the Torah and the Talmud. Just that little bit was enough for him to answer to.
So, yes, there is a Christian homosexual cult because of how they "believe" and "live" Christianity.
As we have all learned over some years now, the Roman Catholic Church is a safe haven for this cult. The Catholic Church protects homosexuals and pedophiles because of its very nature. A Catholic priest, Rev. Paul R. Shanley, was one of the founding "fathers" (pun intended!) of NAMBLA (the North American Man-Boy Love Association), and stated there was nothing wrong with having sex with boys. This was KNOWN by the Catholic Church, and this guy was well-hidden for quite a time and had quite a "time" in the Catholic Church. Boy! You want to talk about a "club" for men!
So, is the Roman Catholic Church ITSELF a type of cult for harboring both homosexuals and pedophiles.
Yes! Look at the lawsuits, the payouts, the closed schools and churches, and the merging of parishes as a result of the great monetary loss. Their "problem" is rampant. The years of this offense, the amount of participation, and the protection for the priests, even elaborate protection by "self-serving" priests, created the cult. Could it be that there IS no Catholic Church without homosexual and pedophilic participation (offenses) of the Church? The "opportunity," the offense, IS the Church! One day they will close down a seminary or two, because we will find out about their "initiation" ceremonies.
"Radio-Free America"
I see the homosexuality debate in "religion" the same as I see belief differences in Christian cults. What I mean by "cults" are the "Christian" religions that are an aberration of the mainstream Christian dogmas. Cults are not mainstream; neither is the homosexual "take" on Christianity.
From Sodom and Gomorrah, to Paul in the New testament, the bible is absolute against homosexuality (and of course other sins, like spouses going out on each other (adultery), and singles having illicit sex (fornication).
Jesus himself told Mary Magdalene to..."Go, and sin no more." She was an adulteress (adultery is sin). Even then, the rabbi's tried to trick Jesus with sin. People today try all the time to trick Christians with sin, and make fun of us, and now at this particular time, with homosexual sin.
Hollywood, various news networks (NPR), the GLA, even our wonderful educational system run by Planned Parenthood and their sycophant, the NEA, are trying hard to sexualize our children. Newer textbooks are even written which show no differences between a two-male parent household, a two-female parent household, or a male-female parent household (of course we all TOLD that the two females believe their household is better).
So, when my kids come home from school and tell us these things, we, [my wife (female) and I (male)] get out the bible and explain what is going on (yes, we are born-again). We let our kids know we were married in a church (similar to the wedding feast at Cana), that we are celibate to the world and exclusive for each other, that God really and truly is ONLY for heterosexual marriage (it says so in scripture). We show them the scriptures. We explain the incontestability of the scriptures, that our opinion really doesn't change what God says. God doesn't change with the times.
We tell them that it's good that God doesn't change with the times. Think what would happen if one "day" God got ticked at Christians and decided to say that his death on the cross is invalid, that he "takes it back" because we aren't worth it. Then we say, "But Jesus, look what's written in your word!" He then says (sarcastically), "So?"
And no, I do not espouse "once saved always saved."
His word is his word. It doesn't change...he doesn't change. You can always count on him. The benefits of "sola scriptura" are immense.
Without sola scriptura you can make any change you want to fit your "need." People miss the fact that Jesus died ACCORDING to scripture. He didn't change it to fit his need (and he had quite a need at the time, don't you think?) Shoot, if scripture was good enough for him to DIE for, wouldn't you think it's good enough for us to LIVE for?
Could I find a scripture or two that would conjure up the idea that I could have sex with whomever I like? Hey, look at what David did to get a girl. He had her husband killed. Remember what Jesus said to Mary..."Go and sin no more." He didn't say, "You should have been a little more discreet, duh!"
It is NOT true that "they" are just like us. Yeah, "they" go shopping just like "we" do, and "they" do other things just like "we" do. "They" study, drive cars, go to restaurants..., but that is not the real issue.
Male homosexuals put their penis in another man's (or boys') butt. That is the general act they are known for. What women homosexuals generally do is cunillingus. So, no, "they" are NOT just like "me," or my kids. And they can't have my kids.
Now, back to cults: the way homosexuals talk about God and scripture is cult. "They" think what they want, regardless of what the bible says. To them, the bible is wrong. As like other cults, a homosexual's Christianity is what THEY think it should be. They even say that Jesus and John were homosexuals..., and they quote, "The disciple that Jesus 'loved'...”
Christians do not accuse Jesus, or any disciple, of being homosexual. Well, maybe the Lutherans do. God (Jesus) is not homosexual. Like murder, this sin is not given a "pass."
The bible is not run by the news media or homosexuals. The bible wasn't written by homosexuals. The bible doesn't answer to "them." Jesus doesn't answer to "them." And even Jesus answered to scripture. That's how important scripture is. And when Jesus answered to it, it was basically just the Torah and the Talmud. Just that little bit was enough for him to answer to.
So, yes, there is a Christian homosexual cult because of how they "believe" and "live" Christianity.
As we have all learned over some years now, the Roman Catholic Church is a safe haven for this cult. The Catholic Church protects homosexuals and pedophiles because of its very nature. A Catholic priest, Rev. Paul R. Shanley, was one of the founding "fathers" (pun intended!) of NAMBLA (the North American Man-Boy Love Association), and stated there was nothing wrong with having sex with boys. This was KNOWN by the Catholic Church, and this guy was well-hidden for quite a time and had quite a "time" in the Catholic Church. Boy! You want to talk about a "club" for men!
So, is the Roman Catholic Church ITSELF a type of cult for harboring both homosexuals and pedophiles.
Yes! Look at the lawsuits, the payouts, the closed schools and churches, and the merging of parishes as a result of the great monetary loss. Their "problem" is rampant. The years of this offense, the amount of participation, and the protection for the priests, even elaborate protection by "self-serving" priests, created the cult. Could it be that there IS no Catholic Church without homosexual and pedophilic participation (offenses) of the Church? The "opportunity," the offense, IS the Church! One day they will close down a seminary or two, because we will find out about their "initiation" ceremonies.
"Radio-Free America"
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
