This is a blog of unique writings, mostly of which I have written. If I did not write it, I so state. My writings are original. I invented the term, or phrase, "'Private' Obama." and "Privadent." He does NOT know better than his Generals...

Monday, October 19, 2009

NPR does it again! They don't get it.

NPR was having a 'discussion' about the analogy of Afghanistan to Vietnam, being a 'quagmire.' I think it's on 'Talk of the Nation.'

I can't believe what I'm hearing. The vets you have on have no real knowledge of history. They must have been trained by John Kerry, with a finishing school by Jane Fonda.

Back in the 'day,' Congress' indecision and politicizing the Vietnam war made it impossible for Congress to finish that war right. I'm speaking as a former Marine.

And please realize...that Kissinger only brokered a retreat for us...he did not end the Vietnam War peacefully. Remember, a retreat IS a military strategy. You can still attack a 'retreat' and maintain...'good form.' In the Gulf War, Saddam's Republican Guard went into full retreat from Kuwait. Our Air force and Navy detroyed them as they retreated...because a retreat IS still a military maneuver.

One of your guests talks about an 'exit strategy.' He says we never had an 'Exit Strategy' when we went into Afghanistan and Iraq. The exit strategy is a dead giveaway for a present-day democrat. That is a ploy of a democrat. It's a smart ploy. An analogy to the 'exit strategy' is a seasoned base-ball player telling a 'rookie' to get him a 'bat-stretcher.' There is no such THING as a bat-stretcher. There is no such THING as an 'exit strategy.' Most victimized presidents, like Bush, don't know that. That's why it was smart to bring up...'exit strategy.' It makes a president really look bad. Bush really thought he missed the memo on that one. He looked really stupid. But, Democrats...read on...

NO one EVER has an exit strategy when they go to war. There are too many variables. Show me FDR's exit strategy. Yeah, he had an exit strategy for fighting on three fronts (Germany, Italy, and Japan). "Exit strategy" is ONLY a political invention by a very jealous, present-day, Democrat party. We had no 'exit strategy' when we engaged our enemies in WW11, or WW1, or ANY wars the U.S. has ever engaged in. Can you imagine having an 'exit strategy' for ... the Revolutionary War? Hah!! Yeah, George Washington didn't get the memo on that one either...sort of like Bush. Right, Democrats? Oh. And by the way, Democrats, did you get the memo on the Vietnam War...that it was YOUR fault, YOUR quagmire. YOU started that one. A Republican had to end it for you...your quagmire. Oh. And you Democrats had ABSOLUTELY...no... "exit strategy." Oh. An "exit strategy" of epic proportions, DID start to form in 1968...at the Democratic National Convention...by the "Chicago Seven." I think it was a real riot.

Eventually seven defendants—Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, David Dellinger, Tom Hayden, Rennie Davis, John Froines, and Lee Weiner. They dropped Bobbie Seale. Your "exit strategy" started to "gel" in 1970 with the Kent State Massacre. Although Nixon was president then, this was your war, a Democrat war, started and "fanned" by whatever morality(?) you all thought you had.

You can't have an exit strategy when you first go to war, and you especially can't even DREAM of having an exit strategy from ANY war when it is mismanaged, second-guessed, your former Vice President SCREAMING tirades against Bush, and you continually charge your state-of-the-art troops with war crimes, and your CIA and other intelligence forces are continually investigated and threatened. Of course, NO ONE EVER INVESTIGATES THE TERRORISTS, or al Jazeera.

The enemy begins to see OUR... "exit strategy" when a timid, smooth-talking, 'child,' (in comparison to presidents before him), saunters onto the scene and talks only a good "game" of socialist 'appeasement,' not sound Capitalism and strength, and cavorts with known killer dictators (Chavez, et al).

YOUR 'exit strategy,' Democrats, is to so emasculate our troops, and so hog-tie them with charges, and making them actually read all captured enemy their (United States Bill of) rights (what rights?). They are now being read their (Obama) rights!!!

Congress has to make decisions. But this congress has absolutely no courage. We have nothing but a 'Private'-in-Chief in command of socialist wimps and political bigots, dumber than a "box o' rocks." He never served a day in his life. Those of them that have, I see why the United States is now in the condition we are in.

We do not have a war-time 'Privadent,' nor do we have a war-time democratic party. We only have a 'wimp-time' socialist party. No decision, lack-luster everything, and a 'Privadent' who continually misrepresents private business by stating that our TAX money has traditionally gone to pay for top executive bonuses...in the MILIONS!! It happens a couple of times in the bailouts, and Obama states that this is a regular business practice. Socialism is sooo weak compared to what this country was.

Back to our 'exit strategy.' What they aren't doing is listening to competent generals. They WILL listen to Rahm Emmanuel, and every anti-American BIGOT and goof (van Jones, et al.) who is against this country.

'Privadent' Obama is writing the book on 'quagmire,' bringing 'decision' to a new height of super-incompetence. Remember, not once did Obama EVER vote to support our troops when he was a Senator. Sorry, but voting ... "present...?" just doesn't ...'get it.'

I AM for pulling out (Oooh, surprise!)...but our troops should pull out by their own decision, commandeering any transportation they can get, and leaving on their own...immediately...as a show of NO CONFIDENCE for our 'Whatever-it-is-' in-Chief, 'Privadent' Obama. They can't arrest them all.

By staying 'in-country' there, without support from our president or congress, they have bulls-eyes painted in N-E-O-N on their backs. To Obama, the troops represent Bush's mistake in the middle-East. 'Privadent' Obama has vicariously left 'Bush' there to die.

Obama is VICARIOUSLY trying to kill Bush ...by not supporting the troops, or sending MORE troops. The Democrats are presently giving every excuse they can...but...they hate President Bush that much. So they hate and try to kill, vicariously, ANYONE who reminds them of Bush. That's why the troops are sort of...left there... stooges of the Democratic Party.

No comments:

Post a Comment